How does “having” function as a transitional phrase in patent claims?
How does “having” function as a transitional phrase in patent claims? The transitional phrase “having” in patent claims can function in different ways depending on the context: Open-ended transition: “Having” is generally interpreted as an open-ended transition, similar to “comprising,” unless the specification or other circumstances suggest otherwise. Closed transition: In some cases, “having” can…
Read MoreCan the transitional phrase “consisting of” ever be interpreted as open-ended in patent claims?
Can the transitional phrase “consisting of” ever be interpreted as open-ended in patent claims? While “consisting of” is generally considered a closed transitional phrase, there are rare circumstances where it might be interpreted as open-ended: Dependent claims: A dependent claim using “consisting of” might be interpreted as open-ended if its base claim uses an open-ended…
Read MoreHow does the transitional phrase “composed of” compare to “consisting of” in patent claims?
How does the transitional phrase “composed of” compare to “consisting of” in patent claims? The transitional phrase “composed of” is generally treated similarly to “consisting of” in patent claims, but with some nuances: Similar to “consisting of”: “Composed of” is typically interpreted as a closed transition, excluding unrecited elements. Potential flexibility: In some cases, “composed…
Read More