How does the USPTO evaluate declarations or affidavits under 37 CFR 1.130(a)?
The USPTO evaluates declarations or affidavits under 37 CFR 1.130(a) based on several factors. According to MPEP 717.01(a)(1): “In evaluating whether a declaration under 37 CFR 1.130(a) is effective, Office personnel will consider the following criteria:” Whether the disclosure was made one year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention; Whether…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO evaluate declarations or affidavits under 37 CFR 1.130(a)?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) evaluates declarations or affidavits under 37 CFR 1.130(a) based on several factors. According to MPEP 717.01(a)(1): In evaluating whether a declaration or affidavit under 37 CFR 1.130(a) is effective to disqualify a disclosure as prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a), Office personnel will consider the following…
Read MoreHow can an examiner’s decision on affidavit sufficiency be reviewed?
The review process for an examiner’s decision on affidavit sufficiency under 37 CFR 1.131(a) involves two different paths, depending on the nature of the review: Formal sufficiency and propriety: MPEP 715.08 states: Review of an examiner’s decision with regard to questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)…
Read MoreWhat is the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s role in reviewing affidavits under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) plays a significant role in the review process for affidavits or declarations submitted under 37 CFR 1.131(a). According to MPEP 715.08: Review of an examiner’s determination on the merits of a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit or declaration is by appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This…
Read More