What is considered “well-understood, routine, conventional activity” in patent eligibility analysis?
“Well-understood, routine, conventional activity” is an important consideration in the patent eligibility analysis, specifically in Step 2B of the eligibility analysis. According to MPEP 2106.05(d), this refers to additional element(s) in a claim that are no more than well-understood, routine, conventional activities previously known to the industry, which are recited at a high level of…
Read MoreHow do examiners evaluate whether additional elements amount to significantly more?
According to MPEP 2106.05, examiners should evaluate whether additional elements amount to significantly more by considering: Improvements to the functioning of a computer or to any other technology/technical field Applying the judicial exception with, or by use of, a particular machine Effecting a transformation or reduction of a particular article to a different state or…
Read MoreHow should examiners evaluate additional elements for meaningful limitations?
When evaluating additional elements for meaningful limitations, patent examiners should consider both individual elements and their combination. This approach is crucial for a comprehensive patent eligibility analysis. MPEP 2106.05(e) provides guidance: “When evaluating whether additional elements meaningfully limit the judicial exception, it is particularly critical that examiners consider the additional elements both individually and as…
Read MoreHow should examiners analyze claims for integration into a practical application?
When analyzing claims for integration into a practical application, examiners should: Identify any additional elements beyond the judicial exception Evaluate the integration of the judicial exception into a practical application Explain why there are no additional elements, or why the additional elements do not integrate the exception Consider the additional elements individually and in combination…
Read MoreWhat additional elements may be required in an international design application?
According to MPEP 2907, certain Contracting Parties may require additional elements in an international design application under Article 5(2) of the Hague Agreement. These additional elements are: An indication identifying the creator of the industrial design A brief description of the reproduction or of the characteristic features of the industrial design A claim The MPEP…
Read More