35 U.S.C. § 257 — Supplemental examinations to consider, (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
35 U.S.C. § 257 Supplemental examinations to consider,
Source: Patent Statute (35 U.S.C.)BlueIron Update:
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 35 U.S.C. § 257, including 236 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Summary
The Supplemental examination process requires patent owners to disclose relevant information to facilitate a thorough examination.
What this section covers
- This section covers the duty of disclosure for patent owners during supplemental examinations, ensuring all relevant information is disclosed.
- The core topic of this section includes the primary requirements and conditions for disclosing information during supplemental examinations.
Key obligations
- Patent owners must disclose all relevant information to the examiner during supplemental examinations.
- Disclosures should be timely and complete, including any new information that may impact the examination.
- Patent owners must comply with USC and CFR requirements for disclosures during supplemental examinations.
Practice notes
- Draft disclosures carefully to ensure all relevant information is included, as any missing details could delay the examination process.
- Avoid common pitfalls by promptly responding to examiner requests and ensuring all disclosures are timely and complete.
Official MPEP § 257 — Supplemental examinations to consider,
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
35 U.S.C. 257 Supplemental examinations to consider, reconsider, or correct information.
- (a) REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL EXAMINATION.—A patent owner may request supplemental examination of a patent in the Office to consider, reconsider, or correct information believed to be relevant to the patent, in accordance with such requirements as the Director may establish. Within 3 months after the date a request for supplemental examination meeting the requirements of this section is received, the Director shall conduct the supplemental examination and shall conclude such examination by issuing a certificate indicating whether the information presented in the request raises a substantial new question of patentability.
- (b) REEXAMINATION ORDERED.—If the certificate issued under subsection (a) indicates that a substantial new question of patentability is raised by 1 or more items of information in the request, the Director shall order reexamination of the patent. The reexamination shall be conducted according to procedures established by chapter 30 , except that the patent owner shall not have the right to file a statement pursuant to section 304 . During the reexamination, the Director shall address each substantial new question of patentability identified during the supplemental examination, notwithstanding the limitations in chapter 30 relating to patents and printed publication or any other provision of such chapter.
- (c) EFFECT.—
- (1) IN GENERAL.—A patent shall not be held unenforceable on the basis of conduct relating to information that had not been considered, was inadequately considered, or was incorrect in a prior examination of the patent if the information was considered, reconsidered, or corrected during a supplemental examination of the patent. The making of a request under subsection (a), or the absence thereof, shall not be relevant to enforceability of the patent under section 282 .
- (2) EXCEPTIONS.—
- (A) PRIOR ALLEGATIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to an allegation pled with particularity in a civil action, or set forth with particularity in a notice received by the patent owner under section 505(j) (2)(B)(iv)(II) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j) (2)(B)(iv)(II)), before the date of a supplemental examination request under subsection (a) to consider, reconsider, or correct information forming the basis for the allegation.
- (B) PATENT ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS.—In an action brought under section 337(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337(a)), or section 281, paragraph (1) shall not apply to any defense raised in the action that is based upon information that was considered, reconsidered, or corrected pursuant to a supplemental examination request under subsection (a), unless the supplemental examination, and any reexamination ordered pursuant to the request, are concluded before the date on which the action is brought.
- (d) FEES AND REGULATIONS.—
- (1) FEES.—The Director shall, by regulation, establish fees for the submission of a request for supplemental examination of a patent, and to consider each item of information submitted in the request. If reexamination is ordered under subsection (b), fees established and applicable to ex parte reexamination proceedings under chapter 30 shall be paid, in addition to fees applicable to supplemental examination.
- (2) REGULATIONS.—The Director shall issue regulations governing the form, content, and other requirements of requests for supplemental examination, and establishing procedures for reviewing information submitted in such requests.
- (e) FRAUD.—If the Director becomes aware, during the course of a supplemental examination or reexamination proceeding ordered under this section, that a material fraud on the Office may have been committed in connection with the patent that is the subject of the supplemental examination, then in addition to any other actions the Director is authorized to take, including the cancellation of any claims found to be invalid under section 307 as a result of a reexamination ordered under this section, the Director shall also refer the matter to the Attorney General for such further action as the Attorney General may deem appropriate. Any such referral shall be treated as confidential, shall not be included in the file of the patent, and shall not be disclosed to the public unless the United States charges a person with a criminal offense in connection with such referral.
- (f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section
shall be construed—
- (1) to preclude the imposition of sanctions based upon criminal or antitrust laws (including section 1001(a) of title 18 , the first section of the Clayton Act, and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to the extent that section relates to unfair methods of competition);
- (2) to limit the authority of the Director to investigate issues of possible misconduct and impose sanctions for misconduct in connection with matters or proceedings before the Office; or
- (3) to limit the authority of the Director to issue regulations under chapter 3 relating to sanctions for misconduct by representatives practicing before the Office.
(Added Sept. 16, 2011, Public Law 112-29, sec. 12, 125 Stat. 284; amended Sept. 16, 2011 Public Law 112-29, sec. 20(j) (effective Sept. 16, 2012), 125 Stat. 284.)
-
- Aia Overview
-
- Appeals
-
- Appeal Notice
-
- Application Types
- Continuing Applications
- Continuation Applications
- Continuation Benefit
-
- Disclosure Basics
- Disclosure Materiality
-
- Employee Testimony
-
-
-
- Reexamination Examination
-
- Reexamination Request
-
- Examination Procedure
- Amendments Practice
- Amendment Entry
-
- Examiner Action
- Action Content
- Action Types
- Form Paragraphs
- Office Action Response
-
- Inter Partes Reexamination
- Inter Partes Reexam Request
-
-
- Pct Request
-
-
- Reissue
- Reissue Concurrent Proceedings
- Reply Period
- Extension Of Time
- Section 112
- Section 112A
- New Matter
-
- Supplemental Examination Request