MPEP § 2289 — Reexamination Review (Annotated Rules)

§2289 Reexamination Review

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 2289, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Reexamination Review

This section addresses Reexamination Review. Contains: 2 statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Quality Assurance Specialist Review

2 rules
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-2289-cecbca80e5216e9d815e0a6c]
Quality Assurance Specialist Review for Reexaminations
Note:
Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialists and Quality Assurance Specialists review reexamination cases to ensure proper procedure is followed.

All reexamination cases are monitored and reviewed in the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) or Technology Center (TC) by the CRU Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) or TC Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS), paralegal or other technical support who might be assigned as backup at several stages during the prosecution. This is done to ensure that practice and procedure unique to reexamination has been carried out for the reexamination proceeding. In addition to the CRU SPRS or TC QAS review of the reexamination cases, a panel review is made prior to issuing Office actions as set forth in MPEP § 2271.01.

Jump to MPEP SourceQuality Assurance Specialist ReviewCentral Reexamination Unit ProcessingAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-2289-4835498d223c260034e0f6b1]
Panel Review Before Issuing Office Actions
Note:
A panel review is conducted prior to issuing office actions in reexamination cases.

All reexamination cases are monitored and reviewed in the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) or Technology Center (TC) by the CRU Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) or TC Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS), paralegal or other technical support who might be assigned as backup at several stages during the prosecution. This is done to ensure that practice and procedure unique to reexamination has been carried out for the reexamination proceeding. In addition to the CRU SPRS or TC QAS review of the reexamination cases, a panel review is made prior to issuing Office actions as set forth in MPEP § 2271.01.

Jump to MPEP SourceQuality Assurance Specialist ReviewCentral Reexamination Unit ProcessingAllowance Quality Review

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Quality Assurance Specialist ReviewMPEP § 2271.01

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31