MPEP § 701 — Statutory Authority for Examination (Annotated Rules)

§701 Statutory Authority for Examination

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 701, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Statutory Authority for Examination

This section addresses Statutory Authority for Examination. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 131, 35 U.S.C. 101, and 35 U.S.C. 100. Contains: 4 requirements and 1 permission.

Key Rules

Topic

First Inventor to File (FITF) System

4 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-67b5bff6e831812fbb3044d5]
First Inventor to File for Patent Applications
Note:
This rule applies to patent applications and patents subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA, defining requirements specific to this system.

[Editor Note: 35 U.S.C. 100(e)-(j) as set forth below are only applicable to patent applications and patents subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA (35 U.S.C. 100 (note)). See pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 100(e) for paragraph (e) as applicable to patent applications and patents not subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.]

Jump to MPEP SourceFirst Inventor to File (FITF) SystemAIA vs Pre-AIA Practice
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-e3c1b4d78bdc037b877118a9]
Requirement for Patent Applications Not Subject to FITF
Note:
This rule outlines the requirements for patent applications and patents not subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.

[Editor Note: 35 U.S.C. 100(e)-(j) as set forth below are only applicable to patent applications and patents subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA (35 U.S.C. 100 (note)). See pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 100(e) for paragraph (e) as applicable to patent applications and patents not subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.]

Jump to MPEP SourceFirst Inventor to File (FITF) SystemAIA vs Pre-AIA Practice
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-6721a5bff4ad1f1d23a77b09]
First Inventor to File System Applies
Note:
This rule states that the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA apply to any patent application, excluding those subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 100(e) definitions.

[Editor Note: Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 100(e) as set forth below is not applicable to any patent application subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA (see 35 U.S.C. 100 (note)). For an application or patent subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA, see 35 U.S.C. 100.]

Jump to MPEP SourceFirst Inventor to File (FITF) SystemAIA vs Pre-AIA Practice
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-48258e79639f67b68ace4a14]
First Inventor to File Provision Applies
Note:
This rule states that for applications subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA, see 35 U.S.C. 100.

[Editor Note: Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 100(e) as set forth below is not applicable to any patent application subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA (see 35 U.S.C. 100 (note)). For an application or patent subject to the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA, see 35 U.S.C. 100.]

Jump to MPEP SourceFirst Inventor to File (FITF) SystemAIA vs Pre-AIA Practice
Topic

Statutory Authority for Examination

2 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-701-65318342e69dba02694e985d]
Director Must Issue Patent If Applicant Meets Requirements
Note:
The Director must examine an application and if the applicant meets patent eligibility criteria, issue a patent.

The Director shall cause an examination to be made of the application and the alleged new invention; and if on such examination it appears that the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law, the Director shall issue a patent therefor.

Jump to MPEP SourceStatutory Authority for ExaminationExamination Procedures
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-0a2063cb880ecc1fef35e241]
Conditions for Patent Grant
Note:
The main conditions that must be met before a patent can be granted to an applicant are outlined in sections 101, 102, 103, and 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code.

The main conditions precedent to the grant of a patent to an applicant are set forth in 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112.

Jump to MPEP SourceStatutory Authority for ExaminationExamination ProceduresPatent Eligibility
Topic

Request by Patent Owner

2 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-701-3512859d76d4231aaab8f65e]
Terms for Patent Examination Defined
Note:
This rule defines key terms used in patent examination, including invention, process, and effective filing date.
When used in this title unless the context otherwise indicates –
  • (a) The term “invention” means invention or discovery.
  • (b) The term “process” means process, art, or method, and includes a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material.
  • (c) The terms “United States” and “this country” mean the United States of America, its territories and possessions.
  • (d) The word “patentee” includes not only the patentee to whom the patent was issued but also the successors in title to the patentee.
  • (e) The term “third-party requester” means a person requesting ex parte reexamination under section 302 who is not the patent owner.
  • (f) The term "inventor" means the individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals collectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention.
  • (g) The terms "joint inventor" and "coinventor" mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention.
  • (h) The term "joint research agreement" means a written contract, grant, or cooperative agreement entered into by 2 or more persons or entities for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work in the field of the claimed invention.
  • (i)
    • (1) The term "effective filing date" for a claimed invention in a patent or application for patent means—
      • (A) if subparagraph (B) does not apply, the actual filing date of the patent or the application for the patent containing a claim to the invention; or
      • (B) the filing date of the earliest application for which the patent or application is entitled, as to such invention, to a right of priority under section 119, 365(a), or 365(b) or to the benefit of an earlier filing date under section 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c).
    • (2) The effective filing date for a claimed invention in an application for reissue or reissued patent shall be determined by deeming the claim to the invention to have been contained in the patent for which reissue was sought.
  • (j) The term "claimed invention" means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent.
Jump to MPEP SourceRequest by Patent OwnerThird Party RequesterRequest Content Requirements
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-701-81d8308c95c8e44027dc489b]
Definition of Third-Party Requester for Ex Parte Reexamination
Note:
Defines a third-party requester as someone requesting ex parte reexamination under section 302 who is not the patent owner.

When used in this title unless the context otherwise indicates –

(e) The term “third-party requester” means a person requesting ex parte reexamination under section 302 who is not the patent owner.

Jump to MPEP SourceRequest by Patent OwnerThird Party RequesterEx Parte Reexamination Request
Topic

Composition of Matter

1 rules
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-701-8eaaf050742d7d20137ce640]
Inventors May Obtain Patents for New Processes, Machines, Manufactures, or Compositions of Matter
Note:
This rule permits inventors to obtain patents for new and useful inventions in the form of processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter, subject to specific conditions.

Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

Jump to MPEP SourceComposition of MatterMachineManufacture (Article of Manufacture)
Topic

35 U.S.C. 101 – Patent Eligibility

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-701-0066bdd9eae67bd68cae3365]
Inventions Not Patentable Under 35 U.S.C. 101
Note:
This rule outlines inventions that do not meet the patent eligibility requirements under 35 U.S.C. 101.

See MPEP §§ 2104 – 2109 and 2157 for a discussion of inventions that are not considered to be patentable under 35 U.S.C. 101.

Jump to MPEP SourcePatent Eligibility
Topic

Reissue Patent Practice

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-701-62ba9ccb6fd3f6e7bd5a57b0]
Effective Filing Date for Reissued Patents
Note:
The effective filing date for a claimed invention in an application for reissue is determined by deeming the claim to have been contained in the original patent.

When used in this title unless the context otherwise indicates –
(i)

(2) The effective filing date for a claimed invention in an application for reissue or reissued patent shall be determined by deeming the claim to the invention to have been contained in the patent for which reissue was sought.

Jump to MPEP SourceReissue Patent Practice

Citations

Primary topicCitation
First Inventor to File (FITF) System35 U.S.C. § 100
First Inventor to File (FITF) System35 U.S.C. § 100(e)
35 U.S.C. 101 – Patent Eligibility
Statutory Authority for Examination
35 U.S.C. § 101
35 U.S.C. 101 – Patent EligibilityMPEP § 2104

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31