How are non-involved claims treated after an interference proceeding?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Claims that were not involved in an interference proceeding remain pending in the application after the final decision. As stated in MPEP 2308.01 : “Claims which were not involved in the interference will remain in the application or patent as they were prior to the interference.” This means that these claims are not affected by the interference judgment and continue to be examined or remain granted as before the interference. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Adverse Judgment Is Final Disposal of Claim MPEP 2308 Prohibited Claim Allowance Consistent With Interference Judgment MPEP 2308 Recommended Estoppel After Judgment Disposes of Issues MPEP 2308 Prohibited Adverse Judgment Requires No Further Office Action MPEP 2308 Prohibited Examiner Must Maintain Rejection Unless Overcome MPEP 2308 Required No Allowable Claims Require Notice of Abandonment MPEP 2308.01 Recommended No Further Examiner Action Required on Claim After Final Disposal MPEP 2308.01 Judgment Against Claim Finally Disposes of It MPEP 2308.01 Losing Party Cannot Reopen Issues Adjudicated Against Them MPEP 2308 Prohibited Estoppel After Judgment for Properly Decided Issues MPEP 2308 Prohibited Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can claims be amended after an interference proceeding? What is the significance of the count in an interference proceeding? What is the effect of an interference judgment on corresponding claims? How does an interference judgment affect a patent claim? What types of judgments in an interference lead to final disposal of claims?