How should patent examiners approach broad and narrow claim interpretations?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The MPEP 904.01 provides guidance on how patent examiners should approach broad and narrow claim interpretations:

“The examiner should analyze the claims, giving them their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification.”

Key considerations include:

  • Applying the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) standard
  • Ensuring the interpretation is consistent with the specification
  • Considering both broad and narrow interpretations when searching for prior art
  • Focusing on novel features or combinations that distinguish the invention

This approach helps examiners conduct comprehensive prior art searches and assess patentability effectively.

Tags: bri, broadest reasonable interpretation, Claim Interpretation, patent examination