How should an applicant handle potentially conflicting claims in copending applications?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

When dealing with potentially conflicting claims in copending applications, applicants must be proactive and transparent. MPEP 2001.06(b) provides guidance:

“If the copending application is not commonly owned and the applicant is aware of the copending application, the applicant should disclose the existence of the copending application to the Office.”

To handle potentially conflicting claims:

  • Disclose the existence of the copending application to the USPTO
  • Identify the potentially conflicting claims
  • Explain any material differences between the claims
  • Consider filing a terminal disclaimer if appropriate
  • Be prepared to address potential double patenting rejections

It’s crucial to address these issues proactively to avoid complications later in the prosecution process or after patent issuance. Failure to disclose potentially conflicting claims could be considered a violation of the duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56.

Topics: MPEP 2000 - Duty Of Disclosure MPEP 2001.06(B) - Information Relating To Or From Copending United States Patent Applications Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: But For Materiality, Disclosure Individuals, Disclosure Timing, Inequitable Conduct Elements, Materiality Standard