When did the current version of 37 CFR 1.56 become applicable?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The applicability of the current version of 37 CFR 1.56, particularly paragraph (c)(3), depends on the filing date of the patent application. According to the MPEP: “[Editor Note: Para. (c)(3) below is applicable only to patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or 363 on or after September 16, 2012.]” This means that for patent applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) (regular nonprovisional applications) or 35 U.S.C. 363 (national stage applications), the current version of 37 CFR 1.56, including paragraph (c)(3), applies. For applications filed before this date, the pre-AIA version of 37 CFR 1.56 may be applicable. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Who Must Disclose Information for Patent Applications MPEP 2001.01 Requirement for Post-Sept. 16, 2012 Patent Applications MPEP 2001 Duty of Disclosure Materiality Revised Based on Therasense MPEP 2000 Duty of Disclosure to Adopt But-For Materiality Standard MPEP 2000 Guidance on Compliance with Duty of Disclosure Regardless of Materiality Standard MPEP 2000 Individuals May Disclose Information to Patent Agent MPEP 2001 Permitted Duty to Disclose Material Information for Patent Applications and Reexaminations MPEP 2001.01 Duty to Disclose Material Information MPEP 2000 AIA Amends Duty to Disclose Errors Without Deceptive Intent MPEP 2000 No Deceptive Intent Required for Correction of Patent Errors MPEP 2000 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What type of information must be disclosed to the USPTO? What is the difference between pre-AIA and current 37 CFR 1.56? Who has the duty to disclose information to the USPTO? What is a prima facie case of unpatent...