What is the typical timing for the first Office action in an inter partes reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 2660 , the first Office action on the merits is usually mailed together with the order granting reexamination. The MPEP states: “The first Office action on the merits will ordinarily be mailed together with the order granting reexamination.” However, there are exceptions to this general practice. If it’s not possible to include the Office action with the order, the examiner should issue the Office action within two months from the mailing of the order, unless the case is awaiting merger with another proceeding. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2660 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2660 First Office Action on Merits for Claim Interpretation MPEP 2187 Permitted First Office Action on CPA Must Notify Applicant MPEP 201.06(d) Examiner Can Issue First Office Action on Same Day as Order If Patent Owner Waives Statement MPEP 2249 Permitted Submissions Considered During First Office Action on Merits MPEP 2253 Amendments Required After First Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2818.01 First Office Action Must Be Complete MPEP 2262 Recommended First Office Action Must Indicate Prior Art Review MPEP 2001.06(b) Required First Office Action Must Consider IPEA/ISA Report MPEP 1893.03(e) Recommended Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What should the first Office action in inter partes reexamination include? What is the panel review conference in inter partes reexamination? Can a patent owner amend claims before the first Office action in inter partes reexamination? How should patent owners respond to the first Office action in inter parte...