Can a third party requester file supplemental comments in inter partes reexamination?
No, a third party requester is not allowed to file supplemental comments in inter partes reexamination. The MPEP clearly states: “The third party requester is not permitted to file further papers to supplement the third party requester’s written comments. Any such improper supplemental comments will not be considered, and will be returned.“ However, there is…
Read MoreWhat rights does a third party requester have regarding new findings of patentability in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination, a third party requester’s rights to comment on new findings of patentability are limited until the appeal stage, unless the patent owner responds to the finding. According to MPEP 2673.01: “The third party requester has no right to comment on and address a finding of patentability made during the reexamination proceeding…
Read MoreWhat are the third party requester’s rights after a patent owner’s submission following an ACP?
After a patent owner’s submission following an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP), the third party requester has the following rights: File one set of comments responsive to the patent owner’s submission Comments must be filed within 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner’s submission Comments are limited to responding to the patent…
Read MoreWho can represent a third party requester in an inter partes reexamination?
A third party requester in an inter partes reexamination must be represented by a registered patent practitioner. The MPEP states: “A third party requester may not be represented during a reexamination proceeding by an attorney or other person who is not registered to practice before the Office.” This means that only attorneys or agents who…
Read MoreCan a third party requester file a reply if the patent owner doesn’t file a statement?
No, a third party requester cannot file a reply if the patent owner does not file a statement in an ex parte reexamination. MPEP 2251 clearly states: “If the patent owner does not file a statement under § 1.530, no reply or other submission from the ex parte reexamination requester will be considered.” This rule…
Read MoreWhat are the service requirements for a third party requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?
In ex parte reexamination, the third party requester must serve a copy of their reply on the patent owner. MPEP 2251 states: “Any reply by the ex parte requester must be served upon the patent owner in accordance with § 1.248.” Additionally, the MPEP directs readers to MPEP § 2266.03 for further details on service…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a third-party requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?
According to MPEP 2254, a third-party requester has specific requirements for filing a reply in ex parte reexamination: The reply must be filed within two months of the date of service of the patent owner’s statement. The reply is limited to issues raised in the patent owner’s statement. No new prior art may be introduced…
Read MoreWhat can a third party requester include in their reply during ex parte reexamination?
According to MPEP 2251, a third party requester’s reply in an ex parte reexamination can be quite comprehensive. The MPEP states: “The reply need not be limited to the issues raised in the statement. The reply may include additional prior art patents and printed publications and may raise any issue appropriate for reexamination.” This means…
Read MoreHow are third-party requester replies considered in reexamination?
In a reexamination proceeding, the examiner must consider replies submitted by third-party requesters. MPEP 2253 provides guidance on this matter: “As to consideration of a reply by a third party requester, the examiner will be guided by 37 CFR 1.535.“ This means that the examiner will follow the rules set forth in 37 CFR 1.535…
Read MoreWhat are the restrictions on a third-party requester’s rebuttal brief in inter partes reexamination?
The restrictions on a third-party requester’s rebuttal brief in inter partes reexamination are specified in MPEP 2678, which cites 37 CFR 41.71(c): “(1) The rebuttal brief of any requester may be directed to the examiner’s answer and/or the respondent brief of the owner. (2) The rebuttal brief of a requester may not be directed to…
Read More