How does the USPTO handle an untimely or inappropriate comment from a third party requester in inter partes reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 2666.10 , if a third party requester files an untimely or inappropriate comment, notice of appeal, or brief in an inter partes reexamination, the USPTO will refuse consideration of the paper. Specifically: “If the third party requester files an untimely or inappropriate comment, notice of appeal or brief in an inter partes reexamination, the paper will be refused consideration.” This policy ensures that the reexamination process adheres to the established timelines and procedures, maintaining the integrity of the proceedings. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.10 Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666 No Third Party Comments After Patent Owner Response MPEP 2666.20 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.10 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.01 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.05 Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.40 Patent Owner Must Serve Response to Reexamination Requester MPEP 2266 Patent Owner Must Serve Response to Third Party MPEP 2266 Required Further Responses to Third Party Opposition Not Considered MPEP 2267 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What are the consequences if a patent owner fails to file a timely appeal after a Right of Appeal Notice in inter partes reexamination? What happens if a patent owner fails to respond to an Office action in an inter partes reexamination? What is the process when a patent owner fails to respond to an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) in inter pa...