How does a divisional application differ from a continuation-in-part application?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
A divisional application discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in the parent application, while a continuation-in-part (CIP) application may include new matter. The MPEP states:
A continuation-in-part application should not be designated as a divisional application. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has concluded that the protection of the third sentence of 35 U.S.C. 121 does not extend to continuation-in-part applications, stating that ‘the protection afforded by section 121 to applications (or patents issued therefrom) filed as a result of a restriction requirement is limited to divisional applications.’
This means that divisional applications have certain protections against double patenting rejections that CIPs do not have.