Can a patent owner file a statement in an ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 257?
No, a patent owner cannot file a statement in an ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 257. This is one of the key differences from reexaminations ordered under 35 U.S.C. 302. MPEP 2823 states: “the patent owner will not have the right to file a statement pursuant to 37 CFR 1.530, and the order…
Read MoreWho can represent a patent owner in a supplemental examination proceeding?
Only registered patent practitioners can represent a patent owner in a supplemental examination proceeding. The MPEP 2804 states: “A patent owner may not be represented during a supplemental examination proceeding or any resulting ex parte reexamination proceeding by an attorney or other person who is not registered to practice before the Office.” This means that…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for identifying patent owners in a supplemental examination request?
When submitting a request for supplemental examination, it is crucial to properly identify the patent owner(s). According to MPEP 2811: “The request must include an identification of the owner(s) of the entire right, title, and interest in the patent requested to be examined, and a submission by the patent owner in compliance with 37 CFR…
Read MoreCan a patent owner request ex parte reexamination?
Yes, a patent owner can request ex parte reexamination. According to MPEP 2212: “The patent owner can ask for reexamination which will be limited to an ex parte consideration of prior art patents or printed publications.“ However, if the patent owner wishes to have a wider consideration of issues by the USPTO, including matters such…
Read MoreWhat factors should be considered when determining a patent’s expiration date for supplemental examination?
When determining a patent’s expiration date for supplemental examination purposes, several factors should be considered. According to MPEP 2808, these factors include: The term of the patent Whether maintenance fees have been paid Any disclaimers filed to shorten the patent term Patent term extensions or adjustments for delays within the USPTO under 35 U.S.C. 154…
Read MoreHow is the enforceability period of a patent determined for supplemental examination purposes?
The enforceability period for supplemental examination purposes is generally determined by adding six years to the patent’s expiration date. However, this period can be extended if litigation is pending. The MPEP 2808 states: “Specifically, if litigation is instituted within the statute of limitations (see 35 U.S.C. 286), requests for supplemental examination may be filed after…
Read MoreWhen can a patent owner file an amendment in an ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 257?
In an ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 257, the patent owner’s ability to file amendments is more restricted compared to standard reexaminations. According to MPEP 2823: “the patent owner cannot file an amendment to the patent until after supplemental examination is concluded and after the issuance of an initial Office action on the…
Read MoreWhat if not all patent owners can participate in filing a supplemental examination request?
In rare circumstances, the USPTO may allow less than all patent owners to file a request for supplemental examination. According to MPEP 2803: “The Office may, under rare circumstances, permit less than all of the owners to file a request for supplemental examination if a grantable petition under 37 CFR 1.183 requesting waiver of the…
Read MoreCan a partial patent owner file a request for supplemental examination?
No, a partial patent owner cannot file a request for supplemental examination. The MPEP 2803 clearly states: “A request for supplemental examination may be filed by the owner(s) of the entire right, title, and interest in the patent.” This means that all owners of the patent must be involved in filing the request. If there…
Read MoreWhat is the panel review process in Supplemental Examination?
After an examiner makes a preliminary determination in a supplemental examination, a panel review conference is convened to review the determination. This process ensures a thorough and accurate examination. The MPEP states: A panel review conference will be convened, and the conference members will review the preliminary determination. See MPEP § 2271.01 for the make-up…
Read More