How should the Sequence Listing XML be submitted in a patent application?
MPEP 2415 states that the Sequence Listing XML should be submitted “as a separate part of the specification.” This means it should be a distinct section within the patent application, separate from other parts of the disclosure. The Sequence Listing XML must conform to the requirements set forth in 37 CFR 1.831(a), which defines the…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for submitting sequence listings in patent applications?
What are the requirements for submitting sequence listings in patent applications? Submitting sequence listings in patent applications involves specific requirements as outlined in MPEP 2412.01: “Patent applications which contain disclosures of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences must contain, as a separate part of the disclosure, a paper or compact disc copy disclosing the nucleotide and/or…
Read MoreWhat additional requirements apply to submissions that include section 301 written statements?
Submissions that include section 301 written statements have specific additional requirements, as outlined in MPEP 2205 and 37 CFR 1.501(a)(3): Identification of the forum and proceeding in which the patent owner filed each statement Identification of the specific papers and portions of the papers that contain the statement Explanation of how each submitted statement is…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a proper 37 CFR 1.501 submission?
A proper submission under 37 CFR 1.501 must meet specific requirements. According to the MPEP, a proper submission: Is limited to patents, printed publications, and/or patent owner written claim scope statements and additional information Includes the requisite citation description and information Includes proof of service on the patent owner (if submitted after an order for…
Read MoreWhat must be included in a submission under 35 U.S.C. 301?
A submission under 35 U.S.C. 301 must include several components, as outlined in MPEP 2205: An explanation of how the person submitting considers the prior art or written statement to be pertinent and applicable to the patent A broad statement of the pertinence and manner of applying the prior art or written statement to the…
Read MoreHow should read-only optical discs be submitted and labeled for patent applications?
When submitting read-only optical discs for patent applications: Discs must be CD-ROM, CD-R, DVD-R, or DVD+R formats Submit in duplicate, labeled as “Copy 1” and “Copy 2” Include a transmittal letter stating the discs are identical Each disc must have a permanent label with specific information Enclose discs in a hard case within a protective…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for submitting ‘Large Tables’ on read-only optical discs?
When submitting ‘Large Tables’ on read-only optical discs, follow these requirements as per 37 CFR 1.58(f) and (i): Submit the discs in duplicate Label the discs as ‘Copy 1’ and ‘Copy 2’ respectively Include a transmittal letter stating that the two discs are identical Files may be compressed using WinZip®, 7-Zip, or Unix®/Linux® Zip Compressed…
Read MoreHow should ‘Large Tables’ be submitted in patent applications?
‘Large Tables’ can be submitted in two ways: Via the USPTO patent electronic filing system as ASCII plain text files On read-only optical discs in compliance with 37 CFR 1.52(e) According to 37 CFR 1.58(d), these ASCII plain text files must: Maintain spatial relationships of table elements Be compatible with PC or Mac computers and…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for facsimile submission of assignment documents to the USPTO?
What are the requirements for facsimile submission of assignment documents to the USPTO? The USPTO has specific requirements for facsimile submission of assignment documents: The facsimile must be legible and complete. The document should be submitted to the Assignment Recordation Branch at the designated fax number. A cover sheet must accompany the submission, stating the…
Read More