What are the requirements for making changes to the specification in a reexamination proceeding?
Changes to the specification in a reexamination proceeding must follow specific guidelines as outlined in 37 CFR 1.530(d)(1): Changes must be made by submitting the entire text of an added or rewritten paragraph. Markings must be included to show the changes: underlining for additions and brackets for deletions. An entire paragraph may be deleted by…
Read MoreCan originally claimed subject matter be considered new matter?
Interestingly, originally claimed subject matter is generally not considered new matter, even if it’s not described in the rest of the specification. According to MPEP 2163.06: “The claims as filed in the original specification are part of the disclosure and therefore, if an application as originally filed contains a claim disclosing material not disclosed in…
Read MoreHow does amending a claim affect the written description requirement?
Amending a claim can potentially raise written description issues. According to MPEP 2163.03: “An amendment to the claims or the addition of a new claim must be supported by the description of the invention in the application as filed.” This means that any changes to the claims must be supported by the original disclosure. Even…
Read MoreCan an applicant amend the specification to meet the written description requirement?
Can an applicant amend the specification to meet the written description requirement? Yes, an applicant can amend the specification to address written description issues, but there are important limitations. According to MPEP 2163.02: “The fundamental factual inquiry is whether the specification conveys with reasonable clarity to those skilled in the art that, as of the…
Read MoreWhat are the restrictions on amending the specification during ex parte reexamination?
What are the restrictions on amending the specification during ex parte reexamination? During ex parte reexamination, amendments to the specification are subject to specific restrictions. According to MPEP 2250: No new matter may be introduced into the specification. Amendments must be made by adding, deleting, or replacing a paragraph, by replacing a section, or by…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for making amendments to patent applications?
Amendments to patent applications must comply with 37 CFR 1.121. The key requirements include: Each section of an amendment document (e.g., Specification Amendments, Claim Amendments, Drawing Amendments, and Remarks) must begin on a separate sheet. Changes to the specification must be made by adding, deleting, or replacing a paragraph; by replacing a section; or by…
Read MoreHow should changes to the specification be made in a patent application amendment?
Changes to the specification in a patent application amendment should be made as follows: By adding, deleting, or replacing a paragraph By replacing a section By providing a substitute specification The MPEP states: In order to delete, replace or add a paragraph to the specification of an application, the amendment must unambiguously identify the paragraph…
Read MoreHow can I challenge an examiner’s new matter rejection?
The process for challenging an examiner’s new matter rejection depends on where the alleged new matter appears: For amendments to the specification: If the new matter is confined to amendments in the specification, you can file a petition to review the examiner’s requirement for cancellation. For new matter in claims: If the alleged new matter…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between petitioning and appealing a new matter rejection?
The distinction between petitioning and appealing a new matter rejection is crucial in patent prosecution: Petition: Used when new matter is confined to amendments in the specification. Appeal: Required when new matter affects the claims, leading to their rejection. According to MPEP 608.04(c): “Where the new matter is confined to amendments to the specification, review…
Read MoreWhat is the process for reviewing an examiner’s new matter rejection in the specification?
When an examiner issues a new matter rejection confined to amendments in the specification, the process for review is through a petition. This is distinct from new matter rejections in claims, which require an appeal. According to MPEP 608.04(c): “Where the new matter is confined to amendments to the specification, review of the examiner’s requirement…
Read More