What are the limitations on a protestor’s participation in reissue applications involved in litigation?

Protestors’ participation in reissue applications, including those involved in litigation, is subject to specific limitations as outlined in USPTO regulations. These limitations are designed to balance public input with the efficient examination of patent applications. According to MPEP 1404: “Protestor’s participation, including the submission of papers, is limited in accordance with 37 CFR 1.291(c).” Key…

Read More

What is the procedure for suspending action in a reissue application with concurrent litigation?

When suspending action in a reissue application with concurrent litigation, examiners are instructed to follow a specific procedure. The MPEP states: “The examiner should consult with the Technology Center Training Quality Assurance Specialist (TQAS) or Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) before suspending action in the reissue application.” Additionally, examiners are provided with a form paragraph…

Read More

What is the priority status of reissue applications with stayed litigation?

Reissue applications with stayed litigation are given high priority in the USPTO. According to MPEP 1442.03, “reissue applications involved in ‘stayed litigation’ will be taken up for action in advance of other reissue applications. Great emphasis is placed on the expedited processing of such reissue applications.” This means that these applications are processed more quickly…

Read More

What reasons might justify a petition to act on a reissue application before the two-month delay period ends?

The USPTO may consider petitions to act on a reissue application before the two-month delay period ends if there are appropriate reasons. MPEP § 1441 provides an example: Appropriate reasons for requesting that the 2-month delay period not be employed include that litigation involving a patent has been stayed to permit the filing of an…

Read More

What are “overlooked aspects” in the context of reissue applications?

“Overlooked aspects” in reissue applications refer to claims drawn to separate inventions, embodiments, or species that were disclosed but never covered by the claims in the original application prosecution. As explained in MPEP 1412.01: “Claims to overlooked aspects are not subject to recapture because the claims are, by definition, unrelated to subject matter that was…

Read More

What information is included in the Official Gazette announcement for a reissue application?

The Official Gazette announcement for a reissue application includes specific details to inform the public. According to MPEP 1430, the announcement includes: Filing date Reissue application and original patent numbers Title Class and subclass Name of the inventor(s) Name of the owner of record Name of the attorney or agent of record Technology Center (TC)…

Read More

How does MPEP Chapter 800 apply to reissue applications?

MPEP Chapter 800 principles generally apply to reissue applications, but with some important considerations. The introduction states: “The general principles set forth in this chapter apply to reissue applications, however see MPEP § 803.05 and § 1450 for a discussion of the prerequisites to making a restriction requirement in reissue applications.” This means that while…

Read More