What is the purpose of the PTO-892 form in reissue applications?

The PTO-892 form, also known as the “Notice of References Cited,” serves an important purpose in reissue applications: It lists references cited or applied by the examiner during the reissue application examination. It includes relevant references from the original patent prosecution that are still applicable to the reissue claims. It helps maintain a clear record…

Read More

How does the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) affect reissue application examination?

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) can significantly impact the examination of reissue applications: Examiners must check the status of any pending PTAB trial related to the patent being reissued The PTAB may exercise exclusive jurisdiction over applications involved in pending trials Examiners should ensure the PTAB has not suspended the reissue application before…

Read More

What happens if a protest is filed in a reissue application related to a patent involved in a pending interference proceeding?

If a protest is filed in a reissue application related to a patent involved in a pending interference proceeding, the reissue application should be referred to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) before any action is taken. As stated in MPEP 1449: “If a protest (see MPEP Chapter 1900) is filed in a reissue…

Read More

What types of proceedings should be reported to the USPTO in a reissue application?

When filing a reissue application, applicants should report various types of proceedings involving the original patent. The MPEP specifies the following proceedings: Interferences Trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including: Derivation proceedings Post-grant review Inter partes review Covered business method proceedings Reissues Reexaminations Litigations The MPEP states: “Additional proceedings that should be…

Read More

Can prior art considered during the original patent examination be used again in a reissue application?

Yes, prior art that was considered during the original patent examination can be used again in a reissue application. The MPEP 1445 clearly states: “Likewise, the fact that during prosecution of the patent the examiner considered, may have considered, or should have considered information such as, for example, a specific prior art document, does not…

Read More

Can a reissue application filed before September 16, 2012, correct multiple errors in the original patent?

Yes, a reissue application filed before September 16, 2012, can correct multiple errors in the original patent. The MPEP 1414.02 states: “It is not necessary to specifically state all of the errors and imperfections being corrected in the reissue application in the reissue oath/declaration. However, it is necessary to identify in the reissue oath/declaration at…

Read More