Does submitting objective evidence of patentability guarantee a patent?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No, submitting objective evidence of patentability does not guarantee a…
Read MoreHow should items be numbered in a requirement for information during patent examination?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When preparing a requirement for information during patent examination, proper…
Read MoreWhat is the Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) form?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) is a separate form…
Read MoreWhat should an examiner do if an amendment is not fully responsive?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. If an examiner determines that an amendment is not fully…
Read MoreIs an applicant required to search for unknown information when responding to a requirement under 37 CFR 1.105?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No, an applicant is not required to search for unknown…
Read MoreNo more FAQs can be generated
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. All possible FAQs have been exhausted and no further meaningful questions can be generated…
Read MoreWhat does ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ mean in patent examination?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. In patent examination, ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’…
Read MoreNo Additional FAQs
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. All relevant information from MPEP 803.01 – Review by Examiner…
Read MoreAfter withdrawing the finality of a rejection, can the next Office action be made final?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Yes, after withdrawing the finality of a rejection, the next…
Read MoreWhat should an examiner do if applicant’s arguments are persuasive but a new ground of rejection is necessary?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When an examiner finds an applicant’s arguments persuasive but determines…
Read More