How should examiners handle after-final amendments or evidence in relation to an Examiner’s Answer?

When handling after-final amendments or evidence in relation to an Examiner’s Answer, examiners should: Ensure each after-final amendment or evidence is indicated as entered or not-entered Issue an advisory action for each after-final amendment or evidence Not comment on affidavits, declarations, or exhibits that were refused entry The MPEP states: “Before preparing the answer, the…

Read More

What are examples of actions that do not constitute a new ground of rejection in an Examiner’s Answer?

According to MPEP 1207.03, the following actions do not constitute a new ground of rejection in an Examiner’s Answer: Pointing out where an appellant’s arguments are not persuasive Responding to new arguments raised in the appeal brief Relying on a different portion of a reference to elaborate upon that which has been cited previously Changing…

Read More

Can a patent application under secrecy order be appealed?

Can a patent application under secrecy order be appealed? Yes, patent applications under secrecy orders can be appealed, but with certain restrictions. MPEP 120 states: ‘Appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and petitions to the Director under 37 CFR 1.181 are available to the applicant in secrecy order cases, but those actions will…

Read More