What are the language requirements for amendments filed under PCT Article 34?
The language requirements for amendments filed under PCT Article 34 depend on the language of the international application and the language of the international preliminary examination. Here are the key points: If the international application was not filed in the language of publication, amendments and accompanying letters must be in the language of publication. If…
Read MoreAre there fees associated with filing amendments under PCT Article 34?
No, there are no fees specifically associated with filing amendments under PCT Article 34. This is explicitly stated in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). As per MPEP 1864.01: “No fee is payable in respect of filing any amendments under Article 34(2)(b).“ This provision allows applicants to make necessary amendments during the international preliminary…
Read MoreHow is the residence or nationality of an applicant determined for PCT purposes?
The determination of an applicant’s residence or nationality for PCT purposes is outlined in MPEP 1864.02, which references PCT Rule 54.1. The process is as follows: Generally, residence or nationality is determined according to PCT Rule 18.1(a) and (b). In certain circumstances, the International Preliminary Examining Authority may request the receiving Office or the national…
Read MoreHow does the novelty requirement in PCT Article 33(2) impact the international preliminary examination?
The novelty requirement in PCT Article 33(2) significantly impacts the international preliminary examination by establishing a key criterion for patentability. During this examination: Examiners assess whether the claimed invention is novel based on the definition provided in Article 33(2). The invention must not be anticipated by the prior art as defined in the PCT Regulations.…
Read MoreHow is novelty defined for international preliminary examination?
Novelty for international preliminary examination is defined in MPEP 1878.01(a)(1), which cites PCT Article 33(2): “For the purposes of the international preliminary examination, a claimed invention shall be considered novel if it is not anticipated by the prior art as defined in the Regulations.“ This definition applies to both the written opinion of the International…
Read MoreHave all possible FAQs been generated for MPEP 1864 – The Demand and Preparation for Filing of Demand?
Yes, all possible FAQs have been exhausted for MPEP 1864 – The Demand and Preparation for Filing of Demand. The key information from this section has been thoroughly covered in the previously generated FAQs, including the purpose and timing of filing a Demand, requirements for filing, preparation and submission process, role of the United States…
Read MoreWhat are the key components of a further written opinion in international preliminary examination?
A further written opinion issued during international preliminary examination should address several key points. The MPEP outlines these components: Defects in the application as described in PCT Article 34(4) Negative findings on novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability Defects in form or contents of the application Amendments that go beyond the original disclosure Observations on…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) in national stage examination?
The International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) plays an important role in the national stage examination. According to the MPEP, “The examiner may adopt any portion or all of the report on patentability of the IPEA or ISA upon consideration in the national stage so long as it is consistent with U.S. practice. The first Office…
Read MoreHow does the IPEA/US handle the written opinion of the International Searching Authority?
The United States International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA/US) generally considers the written opinion of the International Searching Authority (ISA) to be the first written opinion of the IPEA. As stated in the MPEP: The United States International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA/US) will consider the written opinion of the International Searching Authority to be the first…
Read MoreHow does the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) handle top-up searches?
The International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) conducts top-up searches as part of the international preliminary examination process. According to MPEP 1860: “The examiner will conduct a top-up search in the course of drawing up the international preliminary examination report… The top-up search should cover all the relevant documents in the search collections of the IPEA,…
Read More