How does the identification of a single inoperative embodiment affect claim enablement?
The identification of a single inoperative embodiment among many operable embodiments does not necessarily render a claim broader than the enabled scope. The MPEP 2164.08(b) references the In re Angstadt case: “A disclosure of a large number of operable embodiments and the identification of a single inoperative embodiment did not render a claim broader than…
Read More