TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • IP-Backed Loans
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

What is the significance of In re Leshin in MPEP 2144.07?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

What is the significance of In re Leshin in MPEP 2144.07? The case In re Leshin, 277 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) is cited in MPEP 2144.07 as an important precedent. The section states: “Mere selection of known plastics to make a container-dispenser of a type made of plastics prior to the invention,…

Read More

What other cases support the Art Recognized Suitability doctrine?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

Several cases support and further develop the Art Recognized Suitability doctrine. The MPEP 2144.07 cites two additional cases: In re Leshin: “In re Leshin, 277 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) (selection of a known plastic to make a container of a type made of plastics prior to the invention was held to be…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stolen Valor: How Sleazy Patent Attorneys Abuse Inventorship
  • Four Horsemen of the Investor Apocalypse
  • AI-Assisted Patent Search Tools Exacerbate Inventor Biases
  • Your Patent Attorney Is NOT Giving Business Advice
  • Contempt from Crowdfunded Equity
  • Entrepreneurs and Imposter Syndrome
  • AI Startups: Protect Everything EXCEPT the Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA