TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • IP-Backed Loans
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

What is the significance of the In re Kerkhoven case in patent law?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

The In re Kerkhoven case is significant in patent law as it established a key principle regarding the combination of known elements. As cited in MPEP 2144.06, the case states: “It is prima facie obvious to combine two compositions each of which is taught by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose,…

Read More

How does combining equivalents affect patent obviousness?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

Combining equivalents can affect patent obviousness by making a new composition or method prima facie obvious. According to MPEP 2144.06: “It is prima facie obvious to combine two compositions each of which is taught by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose, in order to form a third composition to be used…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stolen Valor: How Sleazy Patent Attorneys Abuse Inventorship
  • Four Horsemen of the Investor Apocalypse
  • AI-Assisted Patent Search Tools Exacerbate Inventor Biases
  • Your Patent Attorney Is NOT Giving Business Advice
  • Contempt from Crowdfunded Equity
  • Entrepreneurs and Imposter Syndrome
  • AI Startups: Protect Everything EXCEPT the Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA