When can the Director initiate a reexamination of a patent?
The Director of the USPTO has broad authority to initiate reexamination of a patent at any time during its enforceable period. As stated in MPEP 2239: “The Director may initiate ex parte reexamination without a request for reexamination pursuant to § 1.510 or § 1.913. Normally requests from outside the Office that the Director undertake…
Read MoreWhat is the timeframe for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination?
The timeframe for filing a notice of appeal in ex parte reexamination is typically two months from the date of the last Office action. According to MPEP 2273, “The period for filing the notice of appeal is the period set for response in the last Office action which is normally 2 months.” However, the MPEP…
Read MoreWhat is the time period for correcting defective papers in ex parte reexamination?
When an examiner issues a notice of defective paper in ex parte reexamination, a time period is set for correction. According to MPEP 2266.02: “A time period from the mailing date of the notice will be set in the appropriate form (PTOL-475 or PTO-2311) for correction of the defect(s). Extension of time to correct the…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for responding to Office actions in ex parte reexamination?
The time limits for responding to Office actions in ex parte reexamination are strictly defined in the MPEP and patent regulations. According to MPEP 2260: “The time for response to any Office action in an ex parte reexamination proceeding will normally be two months… The response period may be extended only upon a showing of…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for filing an appeal brief in ex parte reexamination?
The time limit for filing an appeal brief in ex parte reexamination is two months from the date of the appeal. As stated in the MPEP: “The time for filing the appeal brief is two (2) months from the date of the appeal.” This time limit is important for patent owners to ensure their appeal…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for filing a petition after denial of reexamination?
The time limit for filing a petition after denial of reexamination is strictly defined. According to MPEP 2248: “The requester may seek review by a petition to the Director under § 1.181 within one month of the mailing date of the examiner’s determination refusing ex parte reexamination.” It’s important to note that this one-month period…
Read MoreCan the time limit for completing an incomplete ex parte reexamination request be extended?
The time limit for completing an incomplete ex parte reexamination request can be extended, but only under specific circumstances: Extensions may be granted for sufficient cause if requested in a timely manner. The request for extension must be filed within the original time period for completing the request. Extensions are granted at the discretion of…
Read MoreWhat types of documents can third parties submit during an ex parte reexamination proceeding?
During an ex parte reexamination proceeding, third parties are generally not allowed to make submissions after the reexamination order is issued. However, the USPTO will accept certain documents to ensure a complete file with updated status information. These include: Copies of notices of suits involving the patent Copies of decisions or papers filed in court…
Read MoreCan a third party requester file a reply if the patent owner doesn’t file a statement?
No, a third party requester cannot file a reply if the patent owner does not file a statement in an ex parte reexamination. MPEP 2251 clearly states: “If the patent owner does not file a statement under § 1.530, no reply or other submission from the ex parte reexamination requester will be considered.” This rule…
Read MoreWhat are the service requirements for a third party requester’s reply in ex parte reexamination?
In ex parte reexamination, the third party requester must serve a copy of their reply on the patent owner. MPEP 2251 states: “Any reply by the ex parte requester must be served upon the patent owner in accordance with § 1.248.” Additionally, the MPEP directs readers to MPEP § 2266.03 for further details on service…
Read More