Is commercial success abroad relevant to patent applications in the United States?

Yes, commercial success abroad is relevant to patent applications in the United States. The MPEP clearly states: Commercial success abroad, as well as in the United States, is relevant in resolving the issue of nonobviousness. (MPEP 716.03) This means that applicants can use evidence of commercial success from both domestic and international markets to support…

Read More

What are the challenges in establishing commercial success for design patents?

Establishing commercial success for design patents presents unique challenges. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 716.03(b) specifically addresses this issue: “Establishing a nexus between commercial success and the claimed invention is especially difficult in design cases. Evidence of commercial success must be clearly attributable to the design to be of probative value, and not…

Read More

What is the significance of commercial success in patent applications?

Commercial success can be a significant factor in patent applications, particularly when addressing obviousness rejections. MPEP 716.03 states: Evidence of commercial success, when present, is to be considered in determining the issue of obviousness of a claimed invention. To effectively use commercial success as evidence: The success must be linked to the claimed invention, not…

Read More

What is the significance of commercial success in 37 CFR 1.132 affidavits?

Commercial success can be a valuable form of evidence in 37 CFR 1.132 affidavits to support patentability. MPEP 716.03 discusses the significance of commercial success: ‘An applicant who is asserting commercial success to support its contention of nonobviousness bears the burden of proof of establishing a nexus between the claimed invention and evidence of commercial…

Read More

How does the scope of commercial success evidence relate to patent claims?

The scope of commercial success evidence must align with the scope of the patent claims. This means that the commercial success should be attributable to the specific features claimed in the patent application, not to unclaimed features or broader aspects of the product or process. The MPEP 716.03(a) provides an example: “Evidence showing commercial success…

Read More

What types of objective evidence are considered probative in patent examination?

Objective evidence that can be considered probative in patent examination includes: Unexpected results Commercial success Solution of a long-felt need Inoperability of the prior art Invention before the date of the reference Allegations of derivation of the disclosed subject matter from the inventor However, it’s important to note that “Objective evidence which must be factually…

Read More

What is the ‘nexus’ requirement for commercial success in patent applications?

The ‘nexus’ requirement is crucial when asserting commercial success as evidence of non-obviousness in patent applications. According to MPEP 716.03(a): The term ‘nexus’ designates a factually and legally sufficient connection between the evidence of commercial success and the claimed invention so that the evidence is of probative value in the determination of nonobviousness. To establish…

Read More

How does the MPEP define ‘commercial success’ in patent examination?

The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) does not provide a specific definition for ‘commercial success.’ However, it outlines the requirements for using commercial success as evidence of non-obviousness. According to MPEP 716.03(a): An applicant who is asserting commercial success to support its contention of nonobviousness bears the burden of proof of establishing a nexus…

Read More