TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • IP-Backed Loans
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

Why is the Old Combination rejection no longer valid in patent examination?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

The Old Combination rejection is no longer valid due to changes in patent law and subsequent court interpretations. The MPEP 2173.05(j) states: “A majority opinion of the Board of Appeals held that Congress removed the underlying rationale of Lincoln Engineering in the 1952 Patent Act, and thereby effectively legislated that decision out of existence. Ex…

Read More

What is the “Old Combination” principle in patent law?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

The “Old Combination” principle was a former doctrine in patent law that suggested an inventor who improved only one element of an old combination should not be able to patent the entire combination. However, this principle is no longer valid in modern patent law. As stated in MPEP 2173.05(j): “A CLAIM SHOULD NOT BE REJECTED…

Read More

What was the Lincoln Engineering case and its impact on patent law?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 30, 2024

The Lincoln Engineering case (Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 303 U.S. 545, 37 USPQ 1 (1938)) was a significant ruling that established the Old Combination principle. According to MPEP 2173.05(j): “The principle was that an inventor who made an improvement or contribution to but one element of a generally old combination, should not be…

Read More

How did the 1952 Patent Act affect the Old Combination principle?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

The 1952 Patent Act had a significant impact on the Old Combination principle, effectively invalidating it. According to MPEP 2173.05(j): “A majority opinion of the Board of Appeals held that Congress removed the underlying rationale of Lincoln Engineering in the 1952 Patent Act, and thereby effectively legislated that decision out of existence. Ex parte Barber,…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stolen Valor: How Sleazy Patent Attorneys Abuse Inventorship
  • Four Horsemen of the Investor Apocalypse
  • AI-Assisted Patent Search Tools Exacerbate Inventor Biases
  • Your Patent Attorney Is NOT Giving Business Advice
  • Contempt from Crowdfunded Equity
  • Entrepreneurs and Imposter Syndrome
  • AI Startups: Protect Everything EXCEPT the Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA