What happens if reexamination proceedings are not merged?
When reexamination proceedings are not merged, they are typically conducted separately to maintain the “special dispatch” requirement. As explained in MPEP 2686.01: “If the Office does not merge, the first reexamination proceeding can be concluded, and any question of patentability raised by the second reexamination request can be resolved in the second proceeding, with no…
Read MoreHow are merged reexamination proceedings handled by the USPTO?
When reexamination proceedings are merged, the USPTO follows specific guidelines to ensure efficient handling: A single combined examiner’s action is prepared for all merged proceedings. Each action contains the control numbers of all involved proceedings on every page. A single action cover mailing sheet is used for all parties involved. The patent owner is required…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the order of reexamination proceedings in merged cases?
The order of reexamination proceedings in merged cases is significant because it determines the numbering and record-keeping for the combined examination. According to MPEP 2686.01: “The proceedings will be merged pursuant to the procedures set forth in the MPEP to proceed as a single merged proceeding using the number of the proceeding first ordered to…
Read MoreWhat happens if a reissue application is filed during a reexamination proceeding?
What happens if a reissue application is filed during a reexamination proceeding? When a reissue application is filed during a reexamination proceeding, the following actions are taken: The reexamination proceeding is suspended. The reissue application is examined. The reexamination proceeding is terminated if the reissue patent is granted. If the reissue application is abandoned, the…
Read MoreWhat is the procedure for handling a reexamination request filed during a pending reexamination?
What is the procedure for handling a reexamination request filed during a pending reexamination? When a reexamination request is filed during a pending reexamination, the following procedure is followed: The new request is assigned to the examiner of the pending reexamination. The examiner determines if a substantial new question of patentability is raised. If a…
Read MoreCan a patent owner petition to merge multiple reexamination proceedings?
Yes, a patent owner can petition to merge multiple reexamination proceedings, but there are specific timing requirements. According to MPEP 2686.01: “The patent owner can file a petition to merge the proceedings at any time after the order to reexamine the second request. Note that the acceptance of a petition to merge the multiple proceedings…
Read MoreWhat happens when multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent?
When multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may decide to merge the proceedings or suspend one of them. According to MPEP 2686.01, “Where a second request for reexamination is filed and reexamination is ordered, and a first reexamination proceeding is pending, the proceedings will be…
Read MoreWhat happens if an inter partes reexamination is merged with an ex parte reexamination?
When an inter partes reexamination is merged with an ex parte reexamination, the merged proceeding is conducted according to inter partes reexamination procedures. The MPEP states: “If an inter partes reexamination is merged with an ex parte reexamination, the merged proceeding will be conducted as an inter partes reexamination with the participation of the ex…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle multiple copending reexamination proceedings?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling multiple copending reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP 2686.01: “Where multiple copending reexamination proceedings have been filed for a patent, the Director of the USPTO may determine whether to merge all such proceedings.” The decision to merge proceedings is made on a case-by-case basis. Factors considered include: The status…
Read MoreHow are fees handled in merged reexamination proceedings?
In merged reexamination proceedings, the USPTO simplifies the fee structure. According to MPEP 2686.01: “Where the proceedings have been merged and a paper is filed which requires payment of a fee (e.g., excess claims fee, extension of time fee, petition fee, appeal fee, brief fee, oral hearing fee), only a single fee need be paid.”…
Read More