Can the USPTO examine claims not specifically requested for reexamination?
Yes, the USPTO can examine claims not specifically requested for reexamination, but it’s at their discretion. MPEP 2643 states: “The decision to reexamine any claim for which reexamination has not been requested lies within the sole discretion of the Office, to be exercised based on the individual facts and situation of each individual case.” However,…
Read MoreWhat is required from the requester when filing for inter partes reexamination?
When filing for inter partes reexamination, the requester must provide specific information for each claim they want reexamined. According to MPEP 2643, “35 U.S.C. 311(b)(2) requires that a requester ‘set forth the pertinency and manner of applying cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested.’” This means the requester must explain how…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle amendments or new claims in copending proceedings during reexamination?
The USPTO does not consider amendments or new claims from copending proceedings when deciding on a reexamination request. MPEP 2643 clearly states: “Amendments and/or new claims present in any copending reexamination or reissue proceeding for the patent to be reexamined will not (see MPEP ยง 2640, subsection II.(A)) be considered nor commented upon when deciding…
Read MoreWhat claims are considered when deciding on an inter partes reexamination request?
The claims considered when deciding on an inter partes reexamination request are those in effect at the time of the determination. According to MPEP 2643, “The claims of the patent in effect at the time of the determination will be the basis for deciding whether ‘a substantial new question of patentability’ or ‘a reasonable likelihood…
Read More