What can an applicant do if they only have indirect evidence of an interfering application?
If an applicant only has indirect evidence of an interfering application, they can still attempt to identify it for interference purposes. The MPEP 2304.02(a) provides guidance on this situation: “Occasionally, an applicant will believe another interfering application exists based only on indirect evidence, for instance through a journal article, a ‘patent pending’ notice, or a…
Read MoreWhy is it important for an applicant to provide adequate information when suggesting an interference?
Providing adequate information when suggesting an interference is crucial for several reasons. The MPEP 2304.02(a) emphasizes this importance: “The applicant should be motivated to help the examiner identify the application since inadequate information may prevent the declaration of the suggested interference.” Key reasons for providing adequate information include: Enabling the examiner to accurately identify the…
Read MoreWhat information is required to identify another application or patent for interference?
To identify another application or patent for interference, the following information is typically required: Application serial number (for applications) Patent number (for patents) The MPEP 2304.02(a) states: “Usually an applicant seeking an interference will know the application serial number or the patent number of the application or patent, respectively, with which it seeks an interference.…
Read MoreHow can an applicant suggest an interference with another application or patent?
An applicant, including a reissue applicant, can suggest an interference with another application or patent by providing sufficient information to identify the other application or patent. According to 37 CFR 41.202(a)(1), the suggestion must: “Provide sufficient information to identify the application or patent with which the applicant seeks an interference” Typically, this involves providing the…
Read More