How does the USPTO evaluate rebuttal evidence for obviousness rejections?

The USPTO evaluates rebuttal evidence for obviousness rejections by considering all relevant evidence and weighing it appropriately. As stated in MPEP 2145: “Office personnel should not evaluate rebuttal evidence for its ‘knockdown’ value against the prima facie case, Piasecki, 745 F.2d at 1473, 223 USPQ at 788, or summarily dismiss it as not compelling or…

Read More

What is the ‘teaching away’ doctrine in patent law?

The ‘teaching away’ doctrine is an important concept in patent law related to obviousness rejections. A prior art reference is said to ‘teach away’ from the claimed invention if it criticizes, discredits, or otherwise discourages the solution claimed. However, as MPEP 2145 explains: “A prior art reference that ‘teaches away’ from the claimed invention is…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle arguments about improper hindsight in obviousness rejections?

Applicants often argue that an examiner’s obviousness rejection is based on improper hindsight reasoning. MPEP 2145 addresses this issue: “Applicants may argue that the examiner’s conclusion of obviousness is based on improper hindsight reasoning. However, ‘[a]ny judgment on obviousness is in a sense necessarily a reconstruction based on hindsight reasoning, but so long as it…

Read More