How can an applicant respond to a patent-eligible subject matter rejection?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 2106.07(b), an applicant can respond to a…
Read MoreHow should examiners respond to applicant’s arguments regarding well-understood, routine, conventional activity?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When responding to an applicant’s arguments regarding well-understood, routine, conventional…
Read MoreHow should examiners respond to arguments about claim specificity and non-preemption?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When applicants argue that their claims are specific and do…
Read MoreWhat should examiners do if an applicant challenges a well-known, routine, conventional activity assertion?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When an applicant challenges an examiner’s assertion that certain elements…
Read MoreWhat should examiners do if an applicant argues that an additional element is not well-understood, routine, conventional activity?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When an applicant argues that an additional element is not…
Read MoreHow should examiners evaluate claims with added generic computer components?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When applicants amend claims to add generic computer components, examiners…
Read MoreHow should examiners evaluate applicant’s arguments regarding the improvement to computer functionality or other technology?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When evaluating applicant’s arguments regarding improvements to computer functionality or…
Read MoreWhat should examiners consider when evaluating an applicant’s response to a subject matter eligibility rejection?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Examiners must carefully evaluate all aspects of an applicant’s response…
Read MoreHow can an applicant argue for integration into a practical application or significantly more?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Applicants can argue for patent eligibility by demonstrating that their…
Read More