What are the form paragraphs used for lack of subject matter eligibility rejections?
The MPEP provides specific form paragraphs for rejections based on lack of subject matter eligibility: Form paragraphs 7.04.01, 7.05, and 7.05.01 are used for rejections at Step 1 of the eligibility analysis (failure to claim an invention within the statutory categories). Form paragraphs 7.04.01, 7.05, and 7.05.016 are used for rejections at Step 2B of…
Read MoreHow are Form Paragraphs 7.05.015, 7.05.016, and 7.05.017 used together in patent rejections?
Form Paragraphs 7.05.015, 7.05.016, and 7.05.017 are used together in patent rejections to provide a comprehensive explanation for why a claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of subject matter eligibility. According to MPEP 2106.07(a)(1), these form paragraphs correspond to the steps of the Alice/Mayo test: Form Paragraph 7.05.015: Identifies the claim as…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 7.05.018 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 7.05.018 is used in patent examination to address computer-implemented functional claim limitations in the context of subject matter eligibility rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101. According to MPEP 2106.07(a)(1), this form paragraph is used: “For computer-implemented functional claim limitations, to explain that the computer and algorithm are not sufficiently described.” Specifically, Form Paragraph 7.05.018…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 7.05.017 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 7.05.017 is a crucial tool in patent examination for addressing subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. According to MPEP 2106.07(a)(1), this form paragraph is used: “To explain that the claim(s) do not recite additional elements that amount to significantly more than the judicial exception.” Specifically, Form Paragraph 7.05.017 is employed when: The…
Read MoreWhen is form paragraph 7.05.017 used in patent examination?
Form paragraph 7.05.017 is used in patent examination when dealing with a “tentative abstract idea” – an abstract idea that does not fall within the groupings of abstract ideas discussed in MPEP § 2106.04(a)(2). This form paragraph must be used in conjunction with form paragraph 7.05.016 and requires approval from the Technology Center Director. The…
Read MoreHow does Form Paragraph 7.05.016 differ from 7.05.015 in patent rejections?
Form Paragraphs 7.05.015 and 7.05.016 serve different purposes in patent rejections related to subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. According to MPEP 2106.07(a)(1): Form Paragraph 7.05.015 is used to identify the claim as directed to an abstract idea and specify which abstract idea grouping it falls under. Form Paragraph 7.05.016 is used “To explain…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of form paragraph 7.05.016 in patent examination?
Form paragraph 7.05.016 is used for rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101 when the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception without significantly more (i.e., without an inventive concept). This form paragraph should be preceded by form paragraph 7.05. The MPEP provides the following structure for this form paragraph: “the claimed invention is directed to…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 7.05.015 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 7.05.015 is used by patent examiners to reject claims under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of subject matter eligibility. According to MPEP 2106.07(a)(1), this form paragraph is specifically used: “To identify the claim as a whole as being directed to an abstract idea and to identify the abstract idea the claim is directed…
Read MoreHow is form paragraph 7.05.01 used in patent rejections?
Form paragraph 7.05.01 is used for rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101 when the claimed invention does not fall within one of the four statutory categories of patent-eligible subject matter. This form paragraph should be preceded by form paragraph 7.05. The MPEP provides the following guidance for using this form paragraph: “the claimed invention is directed…
Read MoreWhat is form paragraph 7.04.01 used for in patent examination?
Form paragraph 7.04.01 is used to state the statutory basis for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. It must be included at the beginning of all first actions on the merits and final rejections that involve 35 U.S.C. 101. The MPEP provides the following text for this form paragraph: “35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows:…
Read More