MPEP § 905.03(a) — The CPC Database (Annotated Rules)

§905.03(a) The CPC Database

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 905.03(a), including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

The CPC Database

This section addresses The CPC Database. Contains: 2 requirements, 1 prohibition, and 2 guidance statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Secrecy Orders

5 rules
MPEP GuidanceProhibitedAlways
[mpep-905-03-a-6cab8f1bac76bb9ec9423089]
Classification Symbol for Patent Family
Note:
Each document in a patent family must share the same classification symbols, and additional attributes are stored in the CPC database.
In the CPC database, a document cannot be classified independently of the other documents belonging to the same patent family. Every classification symbol associated with a document, i.e., allocated to the document, is associated with every patent document in the family. Each allocation of a symbol to a patent family has additional attributes stored in the CPC database. These include the following:
  • Classification symbol
  • Type (Invention/other additional information)
  • Position (First/later classification)
Jump to MPEP SourceSecrecy Orders
MPEP GuidanceRequiredAlways
[mpep-905-03-a-e7d963081ef8916ecd38400d]
Invention Information Must Be Classified in CPC
Note:
All disclosed invention information in a patent document must be classified using the CPC system for users to retrieve it from the system.

All disclosed invention information in a patent document must be classified in CPC in order for a user to retrieve the invention information from the system. Therefore, it is mandatory to classify all the invention information disclosed in each family to be classified.

Jump to MPEP SourceSecrecy Orders
MPEP GuidanceRecommendedAlways
[mpep-905-03-a-4566d4a1b224c722dfdab4e3]
Inventive Entities Must Be Separately Classified
Note:
All different inventive entities within a patent document must be identified and classified separately.

Patent documents should not be classified as a single entity. Rather, all different inventive entities, claimed or disclosed within the patent document, should be identified and separately classified. Such different inventive entities are represented by different claims, alternative variants or different categories of subject matter (for example, a product and a method of its production).

Jump to MPEP SourceSecrecy Orders
MPEP GuidanceRecommendedAlways
[mpep-905-03-a-ecaffabf3607e5756df3e24f]
Inventive Entities Must Be Separately Classified
Note:
Patent claims and disclosed variants must be individually identified and classified.

Patent documents should not be classified as a single entity. Rather, all different inventive entities, claimed or disclosed within the patent document, should be identified and separately classified. Such different inventive entities are represented by different claims, alternative variants or different categories of subject matter (for example, a product and a method of its production).

Jump to MPEP SourceSecrecy Orders
MPEP GuidanceRequiredAlways
[mpep-905-03-a-b68ca91da584366e2c33f65a]
Additional Technical Information Classified Discretionarily
Note:
Non-trivial technical information useful for search is classified at the discretion of authorities, unlike invention information which must be classified.

Unlike invention information which must be classified, any additional non-trivial technical information that would be useful for search is classified on a discretionary basis.

Jump to MPEP SourceSecrecy Orders

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31