MPEP § 608.02(e) — Examiner Determines Completeness and Consistency of Drawings (Annotated Rules)

§608.02(e) Examiner Determines Completeness and Consistency of Drawings

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 608.02(e), including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Examiner Determines Completeness and Consistency of Drawings

This section addresses Examiner Determines Completeness and Consistency of Drawings. Contains: 1 guidance statement.

Key Rules

Topic

Final Office Action

5 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-94d918685778a3b9a7cef9ec]
Drawings Objection Not Held In Abeyance
Note:
Objections to drawings in utility or plant applications will not be held in abeyance unless otherwise notified in an Office action.

2. Unless applicant is otherwise notified in an Office action, objections to the drawings in a utility or plant application will not be held in abeyance, and a request to hold objections to the drawings in abeyance will not be considered a bona fide attempt to advance the application to final action. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).

37 CFR 1.77 · 37 CFR 1.85(a)Final Office ActionTypes of Office ActionsExaminer's Action (37 CFR 1.104)
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-70221ead00fd082e479c7ab1]
Drawings Objections Not Held In Abeyance
Note:
Objections to drawings in utility or plant applications will not be held in abeyance unless otherwise notified by an Office action.

3. Unless applicant is otherwise notified in an Office action, objections to the drawings in a utility or plant application will not be held in abeyance, and a request to hold objections to the drawings in abeyance will not be considered a bona fide attempt to advance the application to final action. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).

37 CFR 1.77 · 37 CFR 1.85(a)Final Office ActionTypes of Office ActionsExaminer's Action (37 CFR 1.104)
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-07172eded0ad13ec49261dab]
Objections to Drawings Not Held in Abeyance
Note:
Unless notified otherwise, objections to drawings in utility or plant applications will not be held in abeyance and requesting such is not a bona fide attempt to advance the application.

3. Unless applicant is otherwise notified in an Office action, objections to the drawings in a utility or plant application will not be held in abeyance, and a request to hold objections to the drawings in abeyance will not be considered a bona fide attempt to advance the application to final action. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).

37 CFR 1.77 · 37 CFR 1.85(a)Final Office ActionTypes of Office ActionsExaminer's Action (37 CFR 1.104)
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-b368888a6db285fcc0ccb805]
Drawings Objection Not Held In Abeyance
Note:
Objections to drawings in utility or plant applications will not be held pending and a request for abeyance is not considered a valid attempt to advance the application to final action.

3. Unless applicant is otherwise notified in an Office action, objections to the drawings in a utility or plant application will not be held in abeyance, and a request to hold objections to the drawings in abeyance will not be considered a bona fide attempt to advance the application to final action. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).

37 CFR 1.77 · 37 CFR 1.85(a)Final Office ActionTypes of Office ActionsExaminer's Action (37 CFR 1.104)
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-d8c8fd39ee1ba73d733393dd]
Drawings Objections Not Held In Abeyance
Note:
Objections to drawings in utility or plant applications will not be held in abeyance unless otherwise notified in an Office action.

2. Unless applicant is otherwise notified in an Office action, objections to the drawings in a utility or plant application will not be held in abeyance, and a request to hold objections to the drawings in abeyance will not be considered a bona fide attempt to advance the application to final action. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).

37 CFR 1.77 · 37 CFR 1.85(a)Final Office ActionTypes of Office ActionsExaminer's Action (37 CFR 1.104)
Topic

Drawing Symbols and Legends

1 rules
MPEP GuidanceRecommendedAlways
[mpep-608-02-e-d56e7e0ff4280cd3eccf49f3]
Figures Must Be Correctly Described and Labeled
Note:
The examiner must ensure that the figures are accurately described, reference characters are properly applied, and there are no redundant or missing illustrations.

The examiner should ensure that the figures are correctly described in the brief description of the several views of the drawing section of the specification, that the reference characters are properly applied, that no single reference character is used for two different parts or for a given part and a modification of such part, and that there are no superfluous illustrations.

Jump to MPEP SourceDrawing Symbols and LegendsPatent Application Content

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Final Office Action37 CFR § 1.85(a)
Form Paragraph § 6.27

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31