MPEP § 2120.02 — Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale (Annotated Rules)
§2120.02 Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale
This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 2120.02, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale
This section addresses Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), 35 U.S.C. 102(a), and 35 U.S.C. 132. Contains: 4 requirements, 3 guidance statements, 1 permission, and 2 other statements.
Key Rules
On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d))
Note that as an aid to resolving public use or on sale issues, as well as to other related matters of public availability or public knowledge, an applicant may be required to answer specific questions posed by the examiner and to explain or supplement any evidence of record. See 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.104(a)(2). Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. The examiner may consider making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 where the evidence of record indicates reasonable necessity. See MPEP § 704.10 et seq.
4. If sufficient evidence already exists to establish a prima facie case of public use or on sale, use form paragraph 7.16.fti to make a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b). See MPEP § 2133.03.
If there is not enough information on which to base a public use or on sale rejection, the examiner should make a requirement for more information. Form paragraph 7.104.aia or 7.104.fti can be used.
AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice
2. This form paragraph should only be used in an application filed on or after March 16, 2013, where the claims are being examined under 35 U.S.C. 102 / 103 as amended by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. This form paragraph must be preceded by form paragraph 7.03.aia.
5. If sufficient evidence already exists to establish a prima facie case of public use, sale, or other public availability use form paragraph 7.16.aia to make a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP § 2133.03.
If there is not enough information on which to base a public use or on sale rejection, the examiner should make a requirement for more information. Form paragraph 7.104.aia or 7.104.fti can be used.
Reply Period and Extensions
A 2-month time period should be set by the examiner for any reply to the requirement, unless the requirement is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period, in which case the period for reply to the Office action will also apply to the requirement. If applicant fails to reply in a timely fashion to a requirement for information, the application will be regarded as abandoned. 35 U.S.C. 133.
4. A two month time period should be set by the examiner for reply to the requirement unless it is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period (SSP), in which case the period for reply will apply also to the requirement.
No 'By Others' Requirement (MPEP 2152.02(f))
An applicant may make an admission, or submit evidence of sale of the invention or knowledge of the invention by others, or the examiner may have personal knowledge that the invention was sold by applicant or known by others. See MPEP §§ 2152.02(c) – 2152.02(e) for a discussion of when public use of a claimed invention, placing a claimed invention on sale, or otherwise making a claimed invention available to the public might preclude patentability under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP §§ 2132 and 2133.03 et seq. for a discussion of when public knowledge, public use, or sale of a claimed invention might preclude patentability under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b). If the activity is by an entity other than the inventor or assignee, such as sale by another, manufacture by another or disclosure of the invention by applicant or the inventor to another then both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) may be applicable. If the evidence only points to knowledge within the year prior to the effective filing date then pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) applies. However, no rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) should be made if there is evidence that the inventor made the invention and only disclosed it to others within the year prior to the effective filing date.
AIA Definition of Applicant (37 CFR 1.42)
An applicant may make an admission, or submit evidence of sale of the invention or knowledge of the invention by others, or the examiner may have personal knowledge that the invention was sold by applicant or known by others. See MPEP §§ 2152.02(c) – 2152.02(e) for a discussion of when public use of a claimed invention, placing a claimed invention on sale, or otherwise making a claimed invention available to the public might preclude patentability under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP §§ 2132 and 2133.03 et seq. for a discussion of when public knowledge, public use, or sale of a claimed invention might preclude patentability under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b). If the activity is by an entity other than the inventor or assignee, such as sale by another, manufacture by another or disclosure of the invention by applicant or the inventor to another then both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) may be applicable. If the evidence only points to knowledge within the year prior to the effective filing date then pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) applies. However, no rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) should be made if there is evidence that the inventor made the invention and only disclosed it to others within the year prior to the effective filing date.
Determining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIA
An applicant may make an admission, or submit evidence of sale of the invention or knowledge of the invention by others, or the examiner may have personal knowledge that the invention was sold by applicant or known by others. See MPEP §§ 2152.02(c) – 2152.02(e) for a discussion of when public use of a claimed invention, placing a claimed invention on sale, or otherwise making a claimed invention available to the public might preclude patentability under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP §§ 2132 and 2133.03 et seq. for a discussion of when public knowledge, public use, or sale of a claimed invention might preclude patentability under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b). If the activity is by an entity other than the inventor or assignee, such as sale by another, manufacture by another or disclosure of the invention by applicant or the inventor to another then both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) may be applicable. If the evidence only points to knowledge within the year prior to the effective filing date then pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) applies. However, no rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) should be made if there is evidence that the inventor made the invention and only disclosed it to others within the year prior to the effective filing date.
Patentability Determination
Note that as an aid to resolving public use or on sale issues, as well as to other related matters of public availability or public knowledge, an applicant may be required to answer specific questions posed by the examiner and to explain or supplement any evidence of record. See 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.104(a)(2). Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. The examiner may consider making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 where the evidence of record indicates reasonable necessity. See MPEP § 704.10 et seq.
Requirement for Information (37 CFR 1.105)
Note that as an aid to resolving public use or on sale issues, as well as to other related matters of public availability or public knowledge, an applicant may be required to answer specific questions posed by the examiner and to explain or supplement any evidence of record. See 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.104(a)(2). Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. The examiner may consider making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 where the evidence of record indicates reasonable necessity. See MPEP § 704.10 et seq.
Response to Office Action Requirements (37 CFR 1.111)
A 2-month time period should be set by the examiner for any reply to the requirement, unless the requirement is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period, in which case the period for reply to the Office action will also apply to the requirement. If applicant fails to reply in a timely fashion to a requirement for information, the application will be regarded as abandoned. 35 U.S.C. 133.
Six Month Statutory Period
A 2-month time period should be set by the examiner for any reply to the requirement, unless the requirement is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period, in which case the period for reply to the Office action will also apply to the requirement. If applicant fails to reply in a timely fashion to a requirement for information, the application will be regarded as abandoned. 35 U.S.C. 133.
AIA Effective Dates
2. This form paragraph should only be used in an application filed on or after March 16, 2013, where the claims are being examined under 35 U.S.C. 102 / 103 as amended by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. This form paragraph must be preceded by form paragraph 7.03.aia.
Types of Office Actions
3. A two month time period should be set by the examiner for reply to the requirement unless it is part of an Office action having an SSP, in which case the SSP will apply also to the requirement.
Citations
| Primary topic | Citation |
|---|---|
| AIA Effective Dates AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice | 35 U.S.C. § 102 |
| AIA Definition of Applicant (37 CFR 1.42) Determining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIA No 'By Others' Requirement (MPEP 2152.02(f)) | 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) |
| AIA Definition of Applicant (37 CFR 1.42) AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice Determining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIA No 'By Others' Requirement (MPEP 2152.02(f)) | 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) |
| On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) | 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) |
| On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) Patentability Determination Requirement for Information (37 CFR 1.105) | 35 U.S.C. § 132 |
| Reply Period and Extensions Response to Office Action Requirements (37 CFR 1.111) Six Month Statutory Period | 35 U.S.C. § 133 |
| On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) Patentability Determination Requirement for Information (37 CFR 1.105) | 37 CFR § 1.104(a)(2) |
| On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) Patentability Determination Requirement for Information (37 CFR 1.105) | 37 CFR § 1.105 |
| AIA Definition of Applicant (37 CFR 1.42) Determining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIA No 'By Others' Requirement (MPEP 2152.02(f)) | MPEP § 2132 |
| AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) | MPEP § 2133.03 |
| AIA Definition of Applicant (37 CFR 1.42) Determining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIA No 'By Others' Requirement (MPEP 2152.02(f)) | MPEP § 2152.02(c) |
| On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) Patentability Determination Requirement for Information (37 CFR 1.105) | MPEP § 704.10 |
| AIA Effective Dates AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice | Form Paragraph § 7.03 |
| AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) | Form Paragraph § 7.104 |
| – | Form Paragraph § 7.105 |
| AIA vs Pre-AIA Practice On Sale Under AIA (MPEP 2152.02(d)) | Form Paragraph § 7.16 |
Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP
This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.
Official MPEP § 2120.02 — Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale
Source: USPTO2120.02 Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b): Knowledge by Others, or Public Use, or On Sale [R-07.2022]
An applicant may make an admission, or submit evidence of sale of the invention or knowledge of the invention by others, or the examiner may have personal knowledge that the invention was sold by applicant or known by others. See MPEP §§ 2152.02(c)–2152.02(e) for a discussion of when public use of a claimed invention, placing a claimed invention on sale, or otherwise making a claimed invention available to the public might preclude patentability under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP §§ 2132 and 2133.03et seq. for a discussion of when public knowledge, public use, or sale of a claimed invention might preclude patentability under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b). If the activity is by an entity other than the inventor or assignee, such as sale by another, manufacture by another or disclosure of the invention by applicant or the inventor to another then both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) may be applicable. If the evidence only points to knowledge within the year prior to the effective filing date then pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) applies. However, no rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) should be made if there is evidence that the inventor made the invention and only disclosed it to others within the year prior to the effective filing date.
Note that as an aid to resolving public use or on sale issues, as well as to other related matters of public availability or public knowledge, an applicant may be required to answer specific questions posed by the examiner and to explain or supplement any evidence of record. See 35 U.S.C. 132 and 37 CFR 1.104(a)(2). Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. The examiner may consider making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 where the evidence of record indicates reasonable necessity. See MPEP § 704.10et seq.
A 2-month time period should be set by the examiner for any reply to the requirement, unless the requirement is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period, in which case the period for reply to the Office action will also apply to the requirement. If applicant fails to reply in a timely fashion to a requirement for information, the application will be regarded as abandoned. 35 U.S.C. 133.
If there is not enough information on which to base a public use or on sale rejection, the examiner should make a requirement for more information. Form paragraph 7.104.aia or 7.104.fti can be used.
¶ 7.104.aia Requirement for Information, Public Use or Sale or Other Public Availability
An issue of public use, on sale activity, or other public availability has been raised in this application. In order for the examiner to properly consider patentability of the claimed invention under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), additional information regarding this issue is required as follows: [1]
Applicant is reminded that failure to fully reply to this requirement for information will result in a holding of abandonment.
Examiner Note:
- 1. This form paragraph must be preceded by form paragraph 7.105, and should be followed by form paragraphs 7.122 – 7.126 as appropriate.
- 2. This form paragraph should only be used in an application filed on or after March 16, 2013, where the claims are being examined under 35 U.S.C. 102/103 as amended by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. This form paragraph must be preceded by form paragraph 7.03.aia.
- 3. Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. See MPEP § 2133.03.
- 4. A two month time period should be set by the examiner for reply to the requirement unless it is part of an Office action having a shortened statutory period (SSP), in which case the period for reply will apply also to the requirement.
- 5. If sufficient evidence already exists to establish a prima facie case of public use, sale, or other public availability use form paragraph 7.16.aia to make a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). See MPEP § 2133.03.
¶ 7.104.fti Requirement for Information, Public Use or Sale
An issue of public use or on sale activity has been raised in this application. In order for the examiner to properly consider patentability of the claimed invention under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b), additional information regarding this issue is required as follows: [1]
Applicant is reminded that failure to fully reply to this requirement for information will result in a holding of abandonment.
Examiner Note:
- 1. This form paragraph must be preceded by form paragraph 7.105, and should be followed by form paragraphs 7.122 –7.126 as appropriate.
- 2. Information sought should be restricted to that which is reasonably necessary for the examiner to render a decision on patentability. See MPEP § 2133.03.
- 3. A two month time period should be set by the examiner for reply to the requirement unless it is part of an Office action having an SSP, in which case the SSP will apply also to the requirement.
- 4. If sufficient evidence already exists to establish a prima facie case of public use or on sale, use form paragraph 7.16.fti to make a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b). See MPEP § 2133.03.