MPEP § 211.03 — Time Period for Making a Claim for Benefit Under 37 CFR 1.78 (Annotated Rules)

§211.03 Time Period for Making a Claim for Benefit Under 37 CFR 1.78

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 211.03, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Time Period for Making a Claim for Benefit Under 37 CFR 1.78

This section addresses Time Period for Making a Claim for Benefit Under 37 CFR 1.78. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 111(a), 35 U.S.C. 119(e), and 35 U.S.C. 371. Contains: 6 requirements and 4 other statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Correcting Benefit Claims

6 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-de76a927083fcaad552ae9b6]
Time Period for Making Benefit Claim Not Extendable
Note:
The time period to claim benefits from prior applications under specific U.S. codes must be within the required timeframe and is not extendable without a petition.

If the application is a utility or plant application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the benefit claim of the prior application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) must be made during the pendency of the application and within the later of four months from the actual filing date of the later-filed application or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior-filed application. If the application is a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371, the benefit claim must be made within the later of: (1) four months from the date on which the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f); (2) four months from the date of the initial submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 to enter the national stage; or (3) sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application. This time period is not extendable and a failure to submit the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and/or 120, where applicable, within this time period is considered a waiver of any benefit of such prior application(s) under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), and 386(c) unless a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim is granted. See MPEP § 211.04.

Jump to MPEP SourceCorrecting Benefit ClaimsTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit Claims
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-97edabd94a156b5ea4dcd175]
Petition Not Required for Corrected Benefit Claim
Note:
The Office will not require a petition and fee to correct a benefit claim if the information was recognized in the first filing receipt.

If an applicant includes a claim to the benefit of a prior application elsewhere in the application but not in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the benefit claim is not present in the proper place but is included in an oath or declaration, or the application transmittal letter, or in the first sentence(s) of the specification for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012) within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, the Office will not require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. This is because the application will have been scheduled for publication on the basis of such information concerning the benefit claim. Applicant must still submit the benefit claim in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (i.e., in an ADS in compliance with 37 CFR 1.76 (or for applications filed prior to September 16, 2012 by an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification or in an ADS in compliance with pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.76) to have a proper claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the benefit of a prior application. If, however, an applicant includes a benefit claim elsewhere in the application and the claim is not recognized by the Office as shown by its absence on the first filing receipt, the Office will require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the correction is sought after expiration of the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78. This is because the application will not have been scheduled for publication on the basis of the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Correcting Benefit ClaimsContinuation Benefit ClaimsCorrecting Filing Receipt Errors
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-3ec74d7b23031c3436e45bc1]
Petition Required for Late Benefit Claim
Note:
If a benefit claim is included elsewhere in the application after the deadline, an applicant must file a petition and pay the fee to correct it.

If an applicant includes a claim to the benefit of a prior application elsewhere in the application but not in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the benefit claim is not present in the proper place but is included in an oath or declaration, or the application transmittal letter, or in the first sentence(s) of the specification for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012) within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, the Office will not require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. This is because the application will have been scheduled for publication on the basis of such information concerning the benefit claim. Applicant must still submit the benefit claim in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (i.e., in an ADS in compliance with 37 CFR 1.76 (or for applications filed prior to September 16, 2012 by an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification or in an ADS in compliance with pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.76) to have a proper claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the benefit of a prior application. If, however, an applicant includes a benefit claim elsewhere in the application and the claim is not recognized by the Office as shown by its absence on the first filing receipt, the Office will require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the correction is sought after expiration of the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78. This is because the application will not have been scheduled for publication on the basis of the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Correcting Benefit ClaimsBenefit Claim in SpecificationTiming of Benefit Claim
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-6b9d6ed517c0391fab9d6a12]
Correction of Benefit Claims Without Petition Fee
Note:
Allows correction of timely submitted benefit claims without petition fee for changing application relationships, filing dates, and benefit claim types during pendency.
A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a timely submitted benefit claim for the following situations:
  • (A) Changing the relationship of the applications (e.g., changing from “continuation” or “divisional” to “continuation-in-part” or from “continuation-in-part” to “continuation” or “divisional”);
  • (B) Changing the filing date of a prior-filed nonprovisional or provisional application; and
  • (C) Changing a benefit claim of a prior-filed provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 120 (e.g., “This application is a continuation of prior-filed provisional application No. —”) to a benefit claim of the same provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) (e.g., “This application claims the benefit of prior-filed provisional application No. —”) during the pendency of the later-filed application. Note, however: If the later-filed application has issued as a patent, the correction cannot be made by a certificate of correction and would not be effective in a reissue application because the term of a patent is measured from the prior application’s filing date and removing the benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) would have the effect of lengthening the term of the patent.
Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Correcting Benefit ClaimsBenefit Claim in SpecificationContinuation Benefit Claims
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-ff3ce50daf46255ed2d67c9e]
Petition Required for Late Benefit Claim
Note:
Applicants must file a petition using form paragraph 2.39 if a benefit claim is filed after the required time period without following the necessary procedures.

If a benefit claim is filed after the required time period and without a petition as required by 37 CFR 1.78, the applicant should be informed that the benefit claim was not entered and that a petition needs to be filed using form paragraph 2.39.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Correcting Benefit ClaimsBenefit Claim in SpecificationTiming of Benefit Claim
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-f86db13e9e4c0d210a0d5fd7]
Specification Reference Not Previously Filed
Note:
The specification reference must be submitted in compliance with 37 CFR 1.78 if not previously filed within the required time period.

3. Do not use this form paragraph if the reference to the prior application was previously submitted within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, but not in the location of the application as required by 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the reference was submitted in an oath or declaration or the application transmittal letter), and the information concerning the benefit claim was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. In this situation, the petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) are not required. Applicant is still required to submit the reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.78 by filing an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification (only if the application was filed before September 16, 2012) or an ADS. The reference is required in the ADS if the application was filed on or after September 16, 2012. See MPEP § 210, subsection I and MPEP § 211.03.

35 U.S.C. · 37 CFR 1.78Correcting Benefit ClaimsBenefit Claim in SpecificationProcessing Fees
Topic

Benefit Claim in Specification

3 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-8676557177aeabf8d5915447]
Time Period for Stating Benefit Claim Required
Note:
A benefit claim to a prior application must be stated within a specified time period or it is considered waived. Unintentionally delayed submissions are also addressed.

37 CFR 1.78 specifies: (A) a time period within which a benefit claim to a prior nonprovisional application, international application, international design application, or provisional application must be stated or it is considered waived; and (B) provisions for the acceptance of the unintentionally delayed submission of a claim to the benefit of a prior nonprovisional application, international application, international design application, or provisional application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in SpecificationTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit Claims
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-907169879c17f46ced0dfed2]
Specification Must Contain Proper Benefit Claim
Note:
An applicant must include a claim to the benefit of a prior application in the proper place within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78.

If an applicant includes a claim to the benefit of a prior application elsewhere in the application but not in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the benefit claim is not present in the proper place but is included in an oath or declaration, or the application transmittal letter, or in the first sentence(s) of the specification for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012) within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, the Office will not require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. This is because the application will have been scheduled for publication on the basis of such information concerning the benefit claim. Applicant must still submit the benefit claim in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (i.e., in an ADS in compliance with 37 CFR 1.76 (or for applications filed prior to September 16, 2012 by an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification or in an ADS in compliance with pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.76) to have a proper claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the benefit of a prior application. If, however, an applicant includes a benefit claim elsewhere in the application and the claim is not recognized by the Office as shown by its absence on the first filing receipt, the Office will require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the correction is sought after expiration of the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78. This is because the application will not have been scheduled for publication on the basis of the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in SpecificationTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit Claims
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-feacd826a3244e287a8cbc60]
Reference to Prior Application Must Be Correctly Placed in ADS
Note:
If a reference to the prior application was previously submitted but not in the correct location, it must be included in an ADS for applications filed on or after September 16, 2012.

3. Do not use this form paragraph if the reference to the prior application was previously submitted within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, but not in the location of the application as required by 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the reference was submitted in an oath or declaration or the application transmittal letter), and the information concerning the benefit claim was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. In this situation, the petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) are not required. Applicant is still required to submit the reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.78 by filing an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification (only if the application was filed before September 16, 2012) or an ADS. The reference is required in the ADS if the application was filed on or after September 16, 2012. See MPEP § 210, subsection I and MPEP § 211.03.

35 U.S.C. · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in SpecificationTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit Claims
Topic

Timing of Benefit Claim

3 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-4b5477156189340e45adc795]
Timing of Benefit Claim for Utility or Plant Application
Note:
The benefit claim must be made during the application's pendency and within four months of the later-filed application’s actual filing date or sixteen months from the prior-filed application’s filing date.

If the application is a utility or plant application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the benefit claim of the prior application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) must be made during the pendency of the application and within the later of four months from the actual filing date of the later-filed application or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior-filed application. If the application is a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371, the benefit claim must be made within the later of: (1) four months from the date on which the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f); (2) four months from the date of the initial submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 to enter the national stage; or (3) sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application. This time period is not extendable and a failure to submit the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and/or 120, where applicable, within this time period is considered a waiver of any benefit of such prior application(s) under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), and 386(c) unless a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim is granted. See MPEP § 211.04.

Jump to MPEP SourceTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit ClaimsInternational Filing Date
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-cdcc453320426fd091b168fc]
Benefit Claim Must Be Made Within Four Months of National Entry or Sixteen Months of Prior Filing
Note:
The benefit claim for a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application must be made within four months of national entry, four months after initial submission to enter the national stage, or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application.

If the application is a utility or plant application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the benefit claim of the prior application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) must be made during the pendency of the application and within the later of four months from the actual filing date of the later-filed application or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior-filed application. If the application is a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371, the benefit claim must be made within the later of: (1) four months from the date on which the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f); (2) four months from the date of the initial submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 to enter the national stage; or (3) sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application. This time period is not extendable and a failure to submit the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and/or 120, where applicable, within this time period is considered a waiver of any benefit of such prior application(s) under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), and 386(c) unless a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim is granted. See MPEP § 211.04.

Jump to MPEP SourceTiming of Benefit ClaimContinuation Benefit ClaimsInternational Filing Date
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-64d861f3216127bc30ffe431]
Correction of Provisional Benefit Claim During Pendency
Note:
Permits changing a provisional application’s benefit claim from 35 U.S.C. 120 to 119(e) during the later-filed application's pendency, but not if the later-filed application has issued as a patent.

A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a timely submitted benefit claim for the following situations:

during the pendency of the later-filed application

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Timing of Benefit ClaimCorrecting Benefit ClaimsBenefit Claim in Specification
Topic

Benefit Claim in ADS

3 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-2069989e8b250ee88cb92cc3]
Specification Must Contain Benefit Claim in ADS
Note:
Applicant must include the benefit claim in an Application Data Sheet (ADS) to properly claim priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e).

If an applicant includes a claim to the benefit of a prior application elsewhere in the application but not in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the benefit claim is not present in the proper place but is included in an oath or declaration, or the application transmittal letter, or in the first sentence(s) of the specification for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012) within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, the Office will not require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. This is because the application will have been scheduled for publication on the basis of such information concerning the benefit claim. Applicant must still submit the benefit claim in the manner specified in 37 CFR 1.78 (i.e., in an ADS in compliance with 37 CFR 1.76 (or for applications filed prior to September 16, 2012 by an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification or in an ADS in compliance with pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.76) to have a proper claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the benefit of a prior application. If, however, an applicant includes a benefit claim elsewhere in the application and the claim is not recognized by the Office as shown by its absence on the first filing receipt, the Office will require a petition and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) to correct the benefit claim if the correction is sought after expiration of the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78. This is because the application will not have been scheduled for publication on the basis of the information concerning the benefit claim contained elsewhere in the application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in ADSBenefit Claim in SpecificationContinuation Benefit Claims
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-00855ef1f505ab63c5b72e0e]
Specification Must Contain Reference to Prior Application
Note:
Applicant must submit a reference to the prior application in the first sentence(s) of the specification if the application was filed before September 16, 2012.

3. Do not use this form paragraph if the reference to the prior application was previously submitted within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, but not in the location of the application as required by 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the reference was submitted in an oath or declaration or the application transmittal letter), and the information concerning the benefit claim was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. In this situation, the petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) are not required. Applicant is still required to submit the reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.78 by filing an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification (only if the application was filed before September 16, 2012) or an ADS. The reference is required in the ADS if the application was filed on or after September 16, 2012. See MPEP § 210, subsection I and MPEP § 211.03.

35 U.S.C. · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in ADSBenefit Claim in SpecificationAIA Effective Dates
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-86c3bc817c719117ae6810e7]
Application Data Sheet Requires Prior Application Reference for Filing On or After September 16, 2012
Note:
The application data sheet must include a reference to the prior application if filed on or after September 16, 2012.

3. Do not use this form paragraph if the reference to the prior application was previously submitted within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, but not in the location of the application as required by 37 CFR 1.78 (e.g., if the reference was submitted in an oath or declaration or the application transmittal letter), and the information concerning the benefit claim was recognized by the Office as shown by its inclusion on the first filing receipt. In this situation, the petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) are not required. Applicant is still required to submit the reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.78 by filing an amendment to the first sentence(s) of the specification (only if the application was filed before September 16, 2012) or an ADS. The reference is required in the ADS if the application was filed on or after September 16, 2012. See MPEP § 210, subsection I and MPEP § 211.03.

35 U.S.C. · 37 CFR 1.78Benefit Claim in ADSAIA Effective DatesAIA Overview and Effective Dates
Topic

Continuation Benefit Claims

3 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-c548bed6905bcd9c16142abf]
Change Provisional to 119(e) During Pendency
Note:
Allows changing a benefit claim from a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 120 to 119(e) without petition during the later-filed application's pendency.

A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a timely submitted benefit claim for the following situations:

(C) Changing a benefit claim of a prior-filed provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 120 (e.g., “This application is a continuation of prior-filed provisional application No. —”)

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Continuation Benefit ClaimsDomestic Benefit Claims (35 U.S.C. 120/121)Priority and Benefit Claims
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-eba7f4bb2671e5adde033f8c]
Change Continuation to Provisional Benefit Claim
Note:
Permits changing a continuation benefit claim to a provisional benefit claim without petition and fee, but not after patent issuance.

A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a timely submitted benefit claim for the following situations:

to a benefit claim of the same provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) (e.g., “This application claims the benefit of prior-filed provisional application No. —”)

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Continuation Benefit ClaimsDomestic Benefit Claims (35 U.S.C. 120/121)Priority and Benefit Claims
StatutoryProhibitedAlways
[mpep-211-03-3a684dc7c068e43e35c51263]
Cannot Extend Patent Term by Removing Benefit Claim
Note:
If a later-filed application issues as a patent, removing the benefit claim would extend the patent term beyond its original filing date.

A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a timely submitted benefit claim for the following situations:

Note, however: If the later-filed application has issued as a patent, the correction cannot be made by a certificate of correction and would not be effective in a reissue application because the term of a patent is measured from the prior application’s filing date and removing the benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) would have the effect of lengthening the term of the patent.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Continuation Benefit ClaimsDomestic Benefit Claims (35 U.S.C. 120/121)Reissue Application Filing
Topic

Design Claim Form

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-03-caa6ca5987280e039f13d463]
Claim for Benefit Must Be Submitted During Pendency of Design Application
Note:
The claim under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) for the benefit of a prior-filed application must be submitted while the later-filed design application is pending.

If the application is a design application, the claim under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) for the benefit of a prior-filed application must be submitted during the pendency of the later-filed application.

Jump to MPEP SourceDesign Claim FormDesign Benefit ClaimsDesign Application Requirements
Topic

Amendments in National Stage

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-8d918cc06e2d6a2267560bbd]
Requirement for Original Applications Filed After November 29, 2000
Note:
This rule applies to original applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on or after November 29, 2000, and national stage applications under 35 U.S.C. 371.

1. Use this form paragraph only for original applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on or after November 29, 2000 and for national stage applications under 35 U.S.C. 371. DO NOT use for design applications.

35 U.S.C.Amendments in National StageRequest Content and FormNational Stage Examination
Topic

Interviews in National Stage

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-03-150799754b289c913991f3ca]
Do Not Use for Design Applications
Note:
This rule prohibits the use of this form paragraph for design applications, specifying it is only applicable to original applications filed on or after November 29, 2000.

1. Use this form paragraph only for original applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on or after November 29, 2000 and for national stage applications under 35 U.S.C. 371. DO NOT use for design applications.

35 U.S.C.Interviews in National StageAmendments in National StageRequest Content and Form

Examiner Form Paragraphs

Examiner form paragraphs are standard language that you might see in an Office Action or communication from the USPTO. Examiners have latitude to change the form paragraphs, but you will often see this exact language.

¶ 2.39 ¶ 2.39 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, or 365(c), or 386(c) Benefit Claim is Untimely

The benefit claim filed on [1] was not entered because the required reference was not timely filed within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78 . If the application is an application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) , the reference to the prior application must be submitted during the pendency of the application and within the later of four months from the actual filing date of the application or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application. If the application is a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371 , the reference to the prior application must be made during the pendency of the application and within the later of four months from the date on which the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f) , four months from the date of the initial submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 to enter the national stage, or sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application. If the application was filed before September 16, 2012, the reference must be included in the first sentence(s) of the specification following the title or in an application data sheet; if the application was filed on or after September 16, 2012, the specific reference must be included in an application data sheet. For benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 , 121 , 365(c) , or 386(c), the reference must include the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) of the applications. See 37 CFR 1.78(a) for benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78(d) for benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c).

If applicant desires the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c) or 386(c) based upon a previously filed application, applicant must file a petition for an unintentionally delayed benefit claim under 37 CFR 1.78(c) for benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 37 CFR 1.78(e) for benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c). The petition must be accompanied by: (1) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 120 or 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior application (unless previously submitted); (2) a petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m) ; and (3) a statement that the entire delay between the date the benefit claim was due under 37 CFR 1.78 and the date the claim was filed was unintentional. The Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was unintentional. The petition should be addressed to: Mail Stop Petition, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Amendments in National Stage
Correcting Benefit Claims
Interviews in National Stage
Timing of Benefit Claim
35 U.S.C. § 111(a)
Continuation Benefit Claims
Correcting Benefit Claims
Timing of Benefit Claim
35 U.S.C. § 119(e)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Benefit Claims
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Claim Form
Timing of Benefit Claim
35 U.S.C. § 120
Amendments in National Stage
Correcting Benefit Claims
Interviews in National Stage
Timing of Benefit Claim
35 U.S.C. § 371
Correcting Benefit Claims
Timing of Benefit Claim
35 U.S.C. § 371(b)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Correcting Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.17(m)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Correcting Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.76
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Benefit Claims
Correcting Benefit Claims
Timing of Benefit Claim
37 CFR § 1.78
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Correcting Benefit Claims
MPEP § 210
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Correcting Benefit Claims
MPEP § 211.03
Correcting Benefit Claims
Timing of Benefit Claim
MPEP § 211.04
Correcting Benefit ClaimsForm Paragraph § 2.39

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31