MPEP § 201.07 — Continuation Application (Annotated Rules)

§201.07 Continuation Application

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 201.07, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Continuation Application

This section addresses Continuation Application. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 120, 35 U.S.C. 119(e), and 37 CFR 1.78. Contains: 1 requirement, 1 prohibition, 2 guidance statements, 2 permissions, and 2 other statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Design Benefit Claims

4 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-201-07-cef25c8c2f7f05b2d557ffdc]
Continuation Application for Prior-Disclosed Inventions
Note:
A continuation application must cover inventions disclosed in a prior nonprovisional, international, or design application designating the United States without including new matter.

A continuation application is an application for the invention(s) disclosed in a prior- filed copending nonprovisional application, international application designating the United States, or international design application designating the United States. The disclosure presented in the continuation must not include any subject matter which would constitute new matter if submitted as an amendment to the parent application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Design Benefit ClaimsDesignation of United StatesNationals and Residents
StatutoryProhibitedAlways
[mpep-201-07-bd954e17b081fde5ba3f9945]
Continuation Application Must Not Include New Matter
Note:
The disclosure in a continuation application must not include any subject matter that would constitute new matter if submitted as an amendment to the parent application.

A continuation application is an application for the invention(s) disclosed in a prior- filed copending nonprovisional application, international application designating the United States, or international design application designating the United States. The disclosure presented in the continuation must not include any subject matter which would constitute new matter if submitted as an amendment to the parent application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Design Benefit ClaimsResponse to RefusalStatement Under Article 19
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-201-07-44e92a7525486409ff7f4f06]
Continuation Application Before Patenting
Note:
An applicant may file a continuation application before patenting, abandonment, or termination of an earlier application to introduce new claims and seek further examination.

At any time before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application, an applicant may have recourse to filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) in order to introduce into the application a new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the Office. A continued prosecution application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) (available only for design applications, but not international design applications), however, must be filed prior to payment of the issue fee unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted in the prior application. In addition, a continuation or divisional application may only be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) if the prior application is a nonprovisional design application, but not an international design application, that is complete as defined by 37 CFR 1.51(b) (except for the inventor’s oath or declaration if the CPA is filed on or after September 16, 2012), and the prior nonprovisional application contains an application data sheet indicating the name, residence, and mailing address of each inventor. Use form paragraph 2.05 to remind applicant of possible continuation status.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Design Benefit ClaimsAssignee as Applicant SignatureApplicant and Assignee Filing Under AIA
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-201-07-cdd520d89cbf122022682a4f]
Reminder of Continuation Options for Design Applications
Note:
The rule reminds applicants to consider filing a continuation application under specific conditions before patenting, abandonment, or termination of earlier design applications.

At any time before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application, an applicant may have recourse to filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) in order to introduce into the application a new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the Office. A continued prosecution application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) (available only for design applications, but not international design applications), however, must be filed prior to payment of the issue fee unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted in the prior application. In addition, a continuation or divisional application may only be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) if the prior application is a nonprovisional design application, but not an international design application, that is complete as defined by 37 CFR 1.51(b) (except for the inventor’s oath or declaration if the CPA is filed on or after September 16, 2012), and the prior nonprovisional application contains an application data sheet indicating the name, residence, and mailing address of each inventor. Use form paragraph 2.05 to remind applicant of possible continuation status.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Design Benefit ClaimsAssignee as Applicant SignatureApplicant and Assignee Filing Under AIA
Topic

Provisional Application Benefit

2 rules
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-201-07-e6e16b63c282a050f6620a1d]
Application Not a Divisional of Provisional
Note:
An application claiming the benefit of a provisional application should not be referred to as a divisional of that provisional application.

An application claiming the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) should not be called a “divisional” of the provisional application. See 37 CFR 1.78, especially paragraphs (a)-(c), and MPEP § 211 et seq. for requirements and information pertaining to entitlement to the benefit of the filing date of a provisional application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78Provisional Application BenefitPriority and Benefit Claims
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-201-07-765a63c8e79f00f62642b74b]
Application Not a Continuation of Provisional
Note:
An application claiming the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) must not be referred to as a continuation of the provisional application.

3. An application claiming the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) should not be called a "continuation" of the provisional application.

35 U.S.C.Provisional Application BenefitPriority and Benefit Claims
Topic

Continuation Applications

1 rules
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-201-07-d411d2ea3049979912268b52]
Continuation Application Must Include Prior Inventors and Benefit Claim
Note:
The continuation application must include at least one inventor from the prior-filed application and claim the benefit of the earlier filing date.

The continuation application may be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) (or 1.53(d) if the application is a design application, but not an international design application). The inventorship in the continuation application must include at least one inventor named in the prior-filed application, and the continuation application must also claim the benefit of the prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c). See 37 CFR 1.78, especially paragraphs (d) and (e), and MPEP § 211 et seq. for additional requirements and more information regarding entitlement to the benefit of the filing date of a prior-filed copending application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Continuation ApplicationsDesign Benefit ClaimsContinuing Applications
Topic

Benefit Claim in Specification

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-201-07-2d8d40802fff0612df8fb4b5]
Continuation Application Must Include Inventors from Prior Filed Application
Note:
The continuation application must include at least one inventor named in the prior-filed application and claim the benefit of the earlier filing date.

The continuation application may be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) (or 1.53(d) if the application is a design application, but not an international design application). The inventorship in the continuation application must include at least one inventor named in the prior-filed application, and the continuation application must also claim the benefit of the prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c). See 37 CFR 1.78, especially paragraphs (d) and (e), and MPEP § 211 et seq. for additional requirements and more information regarding entitlement to the benefit of the filing date of a prior-filed copending application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Benefit Claim in SpecificationContinuation Benefit ClaimsContinuation Requirements
Topic

Correcting Benefit Claims

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-201-07-08953a82d1385327e4e3cf1a]
Continued Prosecution Application Must Be Filed Before Issue Fee Payment
Note:
A design application's continued prosecution application must be filed before the issue fee is paid unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted.

At any time before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application, an applicant may have recourse to filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) in order to introduce into the application a new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the Office. A continued prosecution application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) (available only for design applications, but not international design applications), however, must be filed prior to payment of the issue fee unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted in the prior application. In addition, a continuation or divisional application may only be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) if the prior application is a nonprovisional design application, but not an international design application, that is complete as defined by 37 CFR 1.51(b) (except for the inventor’s oath or declaration if the CPA is filed on or after September 16, 2012), and the prior nonprovisional application contains an application data sheet indicating the name, residence, and mailing address of each inventor. Use form paragraph 2.05 to remind applicant of possible continuation status.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Correcting Benefit ClaimsContinuation Benefit ClaimsInternational Design Application Fees
Topic

Benefit Claim in ADS

1 rules
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-201-07-3239d5ede3a2aff810b856c7]
Continuation Application for Nonprovisional Design
Note:
A continuation application can only be filed if the prior nonprovisional design application is complete and contains an inventor’s data sheet.

At any time before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application, an applicant may have recourse to filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) in order to introduce into the application a new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the Office. A continued prosecution application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) (available only for design applications, but not international design applications), however, must be filed prior to payment of the issue fee unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted in the prior application. In addition, a continuation or divisional application may only be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) if the prior application is a nonprovisional design application, but not an international design application, that is complete as defined by 37 CFR 1.51(b) (except for the inventor’s oath or declaration if the CPA is filed on or after September 16, 2012), and the prior nonprovisional application contains an application data sheet indicating the name, residence, and mailing address of each inventor. Use form paragraph 2.05 to remind applicant of possible continuation status.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Benefit Claim in ADSContinuation Benefit ClaimsAIA Effective Dates
Topic

Priority and Benefit Claims

1 rules
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-201-07-0cf334ee2b131eaba731a645]
Continuation Application When Benefit Claim Not Established
Note:
This form paragraph should be used when it appears the application may be a continuation but the benefit claim has not been properly established.

2. This form paragraph should only be used if it appears that the application may be a continuation, but a benefit claim has not been properly established.

35 U.S.C.Priority and Benefit Claims

Examiner Form Paragraphs

Examiner form paragraphs are standard language that you might see in an Office Action or communication from the USPTO. Examiners have latitude to change the form paragraphs, but you will often see this exact language.

¶ 2.05 ¶ 2.05 Possible Status as Continuation

This application discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in prior Application No. [1] , filed [2 ], and names the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the prior application. Accordingly, this application may constitute a continuation or divisional. Should applicant desire to claim the benefit of the filing date of the prior application, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. 120 , 37 CFR 1.78 , and MPEP § 211 et seq .

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Provisional Application Benefit35 U.S.C. § 119(e)
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Applications
35 U.S.C. § 120
Benefit Claim in ADS
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.313(c)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.51(b)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Applications
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.53(b)
Benefit Claim in ADS
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Benefit Claims
37 CFR § 1.53(d)
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Applications
Provisional Application Benefit
37 CFR § 1.78
Benefit Claim in Specification
Continuation Applications
Provisional Application Benefit
MPEP § 211
Benefit Claim in ADS
Correcting Benefit Claims
Design Benefit Claims
Form Paragraph § 2.05

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31