MPEP § 803.01 — Review by Examiner with at Least Partial Signatory Authority (Annotated Rules)

§803.01 Review by Examiner with at Least Partial Signatory Authority

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 803.01, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Review by Examiner with at Least Partial Signatory Authority

This section addresses Review by Examiner with at Least Partial Signatory Authority. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 121. Contains: 2 permissions and 1 other statement.

Key Rules

Topic

Quality Assurance Specialist Review

2 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-803-01-42119451d6f6878d5f5fef19]
Final Restriction Requirement Must Be Signed by Examiner with Full Signatory Authority
Note:
Only an examiner with permanent full signatory authority or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction.

Since requirements for restriction under 35 U.S.C. 121 are discretionary with the Director, it becomes very important that the practice under this section be carefully administered. Notwithstanding the fact that this section of the statute apparently protects the applicant against the dangers that previously might have resulted from compliance with an improper requirement for restriction, IT STILL REMAINS IMPORTANT FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT NO REQUIREMENT BE MADE WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF TWO PATENTS FOR THE SAME INVENTION. See MPEP § 804.01. Therefore, to guard against this possibility, only an examiner with permanent full signatory authority or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction. An examiner with permanent partial signatory authority or temporary partial signatory authority may sign non-final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction.

Jump to MPEP SourceQuality Assurance Specialist ReviewSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-803-01-542abad85a35423f860300a5]
Final Restriction Requires Full Signatory Authority
Note:
Only examiners with permanent or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction to prevent the issuance of duplicate patents.

Since requirements for restriction under 35 U.S.C. 121 are discretionary with the Director, it becomes very important that the practice under this section be carefully administered. Notwithstanding the fact that this section of the statute apparently protects the applicant against the dangers that previously might have resulted from compliance with an improper requirement for restriction, IT STILL REMAINS IMPORTANT FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT NO REQUIREMENT BE MADE WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF TWO PATENTS FOR THE SAME INVENTION. See MPEP § 804.01. Therefore, to guard against this possibility, only an examiner with permanent full signatory authority or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction. An examiner with permanent partial signatory authority or temporary partial signatory authority may sign non-final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction.

Jump to MPEP SourceQuality Assurance Specialist ReviewSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
Topic

Signatory Authority Review

1 rules
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-803-01-c703d969cacae7541afa4cbb]
Examiner with Partial Signatory Authority May Sign Non-Final Restriction Actions
Note:
An examiner with permanent or temporary partial signatory authority can sign non-final Office actions that include a final requirement for restriction.

Since requirements for restriction under 35 U.S.C. 121 are discretionary with the Director, it becomes very important that the practice under this section be carefully administered. Notwithstanding the fact that this section of the statute apparently protects the applicant against the dangers that previously might have resulted from compliance with an improper requirement for restriction, IT STILL REMAINS IMPORTANT FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT NO REQUIREMENT BE MADE WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF TWO PATENTS FOR THE SAME INVENTION. See MPEP § 804.01. Therefore, to guard against this possibility, only an examiner with permanent full signatory authority or temporary full signatory authority may sign final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction. An examiner with permanent partial signatory authority or temporary partial signatory authority may sign non-final Office actions containing a final requirement for restriction.

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality ReviewQuality Assurance Specialist Review

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Quality Assurance Specialist Review
Signatory Authority Review
35 U.S.C. § 121
Quality Assurance Specialist Review
Signatory Authority Review
MPEP § 804.01

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31