MPEP § 706.07(e) — Withdrawal of Final Rejection, General (Annotated Rules)

§706.07(e) Withdrawal of Final Rejection, General

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 706.07(e), including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Withdrawal of Final Rejection, General

This section addresses Withdrawal of Final Rejection, General. Primary authority: 37 CFR 1.116(b) and 37 CFR 1.116(a). Contains: 2 guidance statements, 1 permission, and 2 other statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Appeals in Reexamination

2 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-b3a07b6d1fa912dea9ec78d9]
Amendments and Arguments After Final Rejection Are Considered Under Certain Conditions
Note:
The rule permits amendments and arguments after a final rejection if they place the application in condition for allowance or better form for appeal, or comply with objections or requirements as to form.

Once a final rejection that is not premature has been entered in an application/reexamination proceeding, it should not be withdrawn at the applicant’s or patent owner’s request except on a showing under 37 CFR 1.116(b). Further amendment or argument will be considered in certain instances. An amendment that will place the application either in condition for allowance or in better form for appeal may be admitted. Also, amendments complying with objections or requirements as to form are to be permitted after final action in accordance with 37 CFR 1.116(a).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.116(b)Appeals in ReexaminationEx Parte ReexaminationAppeal Brief Content
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-5729af98ff55f9feff593611]
Amendments to Place Application in Condition for Allowance or Comply with Objections
Note:
Permits amendments that place the application in condition for allowance or comply with objections after final action.

Once a final rejection that is not premature has been entered in an application/reexamination proceeding, it should not be withdrawn at the applicant’s or patent owner’s request except on a showing under 37 CFR 1.116(b). Further amendment or argument will be considered in certain instances. An amendment that will place the application either in condition for allowance or in better form for appeal may be admitted. Also, amendments complying with objections or requirements as to form are to be permitted after final action in accordance with 37 CFR 1.116(a).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.116(b)Appeals in ReexaminationEx Parte ReexaminationAmendments in Reexamination
Topic

Differences Between Claimed Invention and Prior Art

2 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-33ac21321e16122b0773c132]
New Reference Must Fully Meet Claim or Be Obvious
Note:
When withdrawing a final rejection, the new reference must either fully meet at least one claim or meet it with differences that are shown to be completely obvious.

Although it is permissible to withdraw a final rejection for the purpose of entering a new ground of rejection, this practice is to be limited to situations where a new reference either fully meets at least one claim or meets it except for differences which are shown to be completely obvious. Normally, the previous rejection should be withdrawn with respect to the claim or claims involved. See MPEP § 1207.03 for a discussion of what may constitute a new ground of rejection.

Jump to MPEP SourceDifferences Between Claimed Invention and Prior ArtGraham v. Deere FactorsObviousness
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-bf50a8daae9f63a0adc2f80f]
Withdrawal of Previous Rejection for New Ground
Note:
Normally, a previous rejection should be withdrawn when a new reference fully meets the claim or covers it with obvious differences.

Although it is permissible to withdraw a final rejection for the purpose of entering a new ground of rejection, this practice is to be limited to situations where a new reference either fully meets at least one claim or meets it except for differences which are shown to be completely obvious. Normally, the previous rejection should be withdrawn with respect to the claim or claims involved. See MPEP § 1207.03 for a discussion of what may constitute a new ground of rejection.

Jump to MPEP SourceDifferences Between Claimed Invention and Prior ArtGraham v. Deere FactorsObviousness
Topic

Ex Parte Reexamination

1 rules
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-7786386d544aec9042454266]
Final Rejection Not To Be Withdrawn Without Showing Under 37 CFR 1.116(b)
Note:
A final rejection in an application or reexamination proceeding cannot be withdrawn unless the applicant or patent owner provides a showing under 37 CFR 1.116(b).

Once a final rejection that is not premature has been entered in an application/reexamination proceeding, it should not be withdrawn at the applicant’s or patent owner’s request except on a showing under 37 CFR 1.116(b). Further amendment or argument will be considered in certain instances. An amendment that will place the application either in condition for allowance or in better form for appeal may be admitted. Also, amendments complying with objections or requirements as to form are to be permitted after final action in accordance with 37 CFR 1.116(a).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.116(b)Ex Parte ReexaminationAppeals in ReexaminationAppeal Brief Content
Topic

SPE Review Requirements

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-706-07-e-1915c2240cd8ff5fcdd5d5bb]
Approval Required for New Rejections After Appeal
Note:
New grounds of rejection in an Office action reopening prosecution after filing an appeal brief must be approved by the supervisory patent examiner.

New grounds of rejection made in an Office action reopening prosecution after the filing of an appeal brief require the approval of the supervisory patent examiner. See MPEP § 1002.02(d).

Jump to MPEP SourceSPE Review RequirementsSigning and Review of ActionsTypes of Office Actions

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Appeals in Reexamination
Ex Parte Reexamination
37 CFR § 1.116(a)
Appeals in Reexamination
Ex Parte Reexamination
37 CFR § 1.116(b)
37 CFR § 714.13
SPE Review RequirementsMPEP § 1002.02(d)
Differences Between Claimed Invention and Prior ArtMPEP § 1207.03
MPEP § 714.12

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31