MPEP § 211.01 — Requirements Related to the Prior-Filed Application (Annotated Rules)

§211.01 Requirements Related to the Prior-Filed Application

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 211.01, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Requirements Related to the Prior-Filed Application

This section addresses Requirements Related to the Prior-Filed Application. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 111(a), 35 U.S.C. 119(e), and 35 U.S.C. 120. Contains: 4 requirements, 1 guidance statement, 1 permission, and 1 other statement.

Key Rules

Topic

Claiming Benefit of Provisional

3 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-26c38c6f761b71a70d713cc3]
Provisional Application Must Have Valid Filing Date and Paid Fee
Note:
The provisional application must have a valid filing date as set by 37 CFR 1.53(c) and the basic filing fee must be paid within the time period set by 37 CFR 1.53(g).

If the prior-filed application is a provisional application, the provisional application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(c) and the basic filing fee of the provisional application must have been paid within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.53(g). See 37 CFR 1.78(a)(2).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(c)Claiming Benefit of ProvisionalProvisional Application RequirementsProvisional Applications
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-211-01-31c11042336d322745c1e4db]
Petition to Revive Provisional Application After Abandonment Due to Missing Fee
Note:
An applicant can revive a provisional application abandoned due to missing basic filing fee by filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.137 and paying the fee within the specified time period.

If a provisional application is abandoned due to, at least, a failure to pay the basic filing fee, applicant may still claim benefit to the prior-filed application by filing a petition to revive under 37 CFR 1.137 in the provisional application to pay the basic filing fee. If such a petition to revive is grantable, the decision granting the petition should indicate that the basic filing fee is being accepted as having been paid within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(g) for purposes of compliance with 37 CFR 1.78(a)(2) in any subsequent nonprovisional application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.137Claiming Benefit of Provisional12-Month Pendency PeriodProvisional Application Requirements
StatutoryRecommendedAlways
[mpep-211-01-631c0031e4a7d350b4876cd0]
Petition to Revive Must Accept Basic Filing Fee Payment
Note:
If a petition to revive a provisional application is granted, the decision must indicate that the basic filing fee has been accepted as paid within the time period set for compliance with subsequent nonprovisional applications.

If a provisional application is abandoned due to, at least, a failure to pay the basic filing fee, applicant may still claim benefit to the prior-filed application by filing a petition to revive under 37 CFR 1.137 in the provisional application to pay the basic filing fee. If such a petition to revive is grantable, the decision granting the petition should indicate that the basic filing fee is being accepted as having been paid within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(g) for purposes of compliance with 37 CFR 1.78(a)(2) in any subsequent nonprovisional application.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.137Claiming Benefit of ProvisionalConversion to NonprovisionalNonprovisional Applications
Topic

Designation of United States

2 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-e260053e9bb40e08f569ad15]
Filing Date Must Be Entitled for International Application Designating US
Note:
The prior-filed international application designating the United States must have a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11.

If the prior-filed application is a nonprovisional application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b) or (d), and the basic filing fee as set forth in 37 CFR 1.16 must have been paid within the pendency of the application. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(iii). If the prior-filed application is an international application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(i). If the prior-filed application is an international design application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Designation of United StatesFiling Date RequirementsInternational Filing Date
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-dd4ef246f7956e7323b01bff]
Filing Date Required for International Design Application Designating US
Note:
The prior-filed international design application designating the United States must have a filing date in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023.

If the prior-filed application is a nonprovisional application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b) or (d), and the basic filing fee as set forth in 37 CFR 1.16 must have been paid within the pendency of the application. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(iii). If the prior-filed application is an international application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(i). If the prior-filed application is an international design application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)Designation of United StatesFiling Date RequirementsInternational Filing Date
Topic

Provisional Application Benefit

2 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-01-abcd74a9aba7a25151a9e3ba]
Inventors Must Be Named in Continuation Applications
Note:
Applications claiming benefit of an earlier filing date must name the inventor or at least one joint inventor from the prior-filed application.

The statute requires that applications claiming benefit of the earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or 120 name the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the previously filed application or provisional application. See MPEP §§ 201.06, 602.01(c) et seq. and 1412.04 for correction of inventorship. If upon filing of the application and the filing of a relied upon prior-filed application there is an overlap in appropriately named inventorship, an application otherwise properly identified as a continuation, continuation-in-part or divisional application (and meeting all other requirements) can claim benefit of the prior-filed application's filing date pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 120 and 121. Note that to be entitled to the benefit of any prior-filed application(s), in addition to naming the inventor or at least one common joint inventor, the invention claimed in the later-filed application must be supported in the manner provided by the 35 U.S.C. 112(a), except for the best mode requirement. See MPEP § 211.05.

Jump to MPEP SourceProvisional Application BenefitPriority and Benefit ClaimsDisclosure Requirements
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-01-78b69ffbe7824b94b7bef322]
Requirement for Claiming Provisional Application Priority
Note:
The rule requires that applicants must claim the benefit of a provisional application to establish priority.

See MPEP § 211.01(a) for additional information and requirements specific to claiming the benefit of a provisional application.

Jump to MPEP SourceProvisional Application BenefitPriority and Benefit Claims
Topic

Priority and Benefit Claims

2 rules
StatutoryPermittedAlways
[mpep-211-01-2de6ee1fa178e2ad9a2b9851]
Inventorship Overlap Allows Benefit Claim
Note:
An application can claim the benefit of a prior-filed application's filing date if there is an overlap in inventorship, provided it meets all other requirements for being a continuation or divisional application.

The statute requires that applications claiming benefit of the earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or 120 name the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the previously filed application or provisional application. See MPEP §§ 201.06, 602.01(c) et seq. and 1412.04 for correction of inventorship. If upon filing of the application and the filing of a relied upon prior-filed application there is an overlap in appropriately named inventorship, an application otherwise properly identified as a continuation, continuation-in-part or divisional application (and meeting all other requirements) can claim benefit of the prior-filed application's filing date pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 120 and 121. Note that to be entitled to the benefit of any prior-filed application(s), in addition to naming the inventor or at least one common joint inventor, the invention claimed in the later-filed application must be supported in the manner provided by the 35 U.S.C. 112(a), except for the best mode requirement. See MPEP § 211.05.

Jump to MPEP SourcePriority and Benefit ClaimsProvisional Application BenefitDisclosure Requirements
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-01-af73405f1b51a29d40897da1]
Claiming Benefit of Earlier Application
Note:
This rule requires claiming the benefit of an earlier-filed nonprovisional application as specified in MPEP § 211.01(b).

See MPEP § 211.01(b) for additional information and requirements specific to claiming the benefit of an earlier-filed nonprovisional application.

Jump to MPEP SourcePriority and Benefit Claims
Topic

International Design Application Fees

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-6373bee44d04492d31b97dbd]
Filing Date Required for Nonprovisional Application
Note:
The prior-filed nonprovisional application must have a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b) or (d), and the basic filing fee must be paid during its pendency.

If the prior-filed application is a nonprovisional application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b) or (d), and the basic filing fee as set forth in 37 CFR 1.16 must have been paid within the pendency of the application. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(iii). If the prior-filed application is an international application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(i). If the prior-filed application is an international design application designating the United States, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023. See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.53(b)International Design Application FeesFiling Date RequirementsInternational Filing Date
Topic

Petition to Suspend/Waive Rules (37 CFR 1.183)

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-211-01-4c115e74d15910c1ffdad960]
No Petition Needed for Provisional Benefit Claim
Note:
A petition under 37 CFR 1.183 is not required to claim benefit of a provisional application.

A petition under 37 CFR 1.183 in order to claim benefit of such a provisional application is not necessary.

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.183Petition to Suspend/Waive Rules (37 CFR 1.183)Petition Procedures (MPEP 1002)Director Authority and Petitions (MPEP 1000)
Topic

35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-0d98540b3be0f880325f4684]
Invention Must Be Supported by Description
Note:
The later-filed application must describe the invention in a manner that supports it, except for the best mode requirement, to claim benefit of an earlier-filed application.

The statute requires that applications claiming benefit of the earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or 120 name the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the previously filed application or provisional application. See MPEP §§ 201.06, 602.01(c) et seq. and 1412.04 for correction of inventorship. If upon filing of the application and the filing of a relied upon prior-filed application there is an overlap in appropriately named inventorship, an application otherwise properly identified as a continuation, continuation-in-part or divisional application (and meeting all other requirements) can claim benefit of the prior-filed application's filing date pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 120 and 121. Note that to be entitled to the benefit of any prior-filed application(s), in addition to naming the inventor or at least one common joint inventor, the invention claimed in the later-filed application must be supported in the manner provided by the 35 U.S.C. 112(a), except for the best mode requirement. See MPEP § 211.05.

Jump to MPEP SourceDisclosure RequirementsProvisional Application BenefitPriority and Benefit Claims
Topic

AIA Effective Dates

1 rules
StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-211-01-b3809d24def6b56eba70bb97]
Claim to Invention with AIA Filing Date
Note:
An applicant must provide a statement if a nonprovisional application filed on or after March 16, 2013, claims the benefit of an earlier filing date and includes a claim with an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013.

If a nonprovisional application filed on or after March 16, 2013, claims the benefit of the filing date of a provisional or nonprovisional application filed prior to March 16, 2013, and also contains, or contained at any time, a claim to a claimed invention that has an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013, the applicant must provide a statement to that effect within a specified time period. See 37 CFR 1.78(a)(6) and (d)(6) and MPEP § 210, subsection III. Nonprovisional international design applications are excluded from the transition provisions of 37 CFR 1.78(a)(6) and (d)(6).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.78(a)(6)AIA Effective DatesDetermining Whether Application Is AIA or Pre-AIATransition Applications
Topic

Filing, Search & Examination Fees

1 rules
MPEP GuidancePermittedAlways
[mpep-211-01-319cf59eaeafc82656d9c217]
Application Not Entitled to Prior Filed Application Due to Missing Filing Fee
Note:
Form paragraph 2.40 is used to notify applicants that their application does not qualify for the benefit of a prior-filed application because the prior-filed application lacked a filing date or did not include the basic filing fee.

Form paragraph 2.40 may be used to notify applicant that the application is not entitled to the benefit of the prior-filed application because the prior-filed application was not entitled to a filing date and/or did not include the basic filing fee.

Jump to MPEP SourceFiling, Search & Examination FeesFee Requirements

Examiner Form Paragraphs

Examiner form paragraphs are standard language that you might see in an Office Action or communication from the USPTO. Examiners have latitude to change the form paragraphs, but you will often see this exact language.

¶ 2.40 ¶ 2.40 Prior-Filed Application Not Entitled to a Filing Date or Basic Filing Fee Was Not Paid

This application claims the benefit of prior-filed application No. [1] under 120 , 121 , 365(c) , or 386(c) or under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) . If the prior-filed application is an international application designating the United States, it must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11 ; if the prior-filed application is an international design application designating the United States, it must be entitled to a filing date in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023 ; and if the prior-filed application is a nonprovisional application under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) , the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(b) or 1.53(d) and include the basic filing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.16 . See 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1) . If the prior-filed application is a provisional application, the prior-filed application must be entitled to a filing date as set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(c) and the basic filing fee must be paid within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(g) . See 37 CFR 1.78(a)(2) .

This application is not entitled to the benefit of the prior-filed application because the prior-filed application [2] . Applicant is required to delete the benefit claim to the prior-filed application from the Application Data Sheet (ADS) or, for applications filed before September 16, 2012, from the ADS or the first sentence(s) of the specification as appropriate.

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
35 U.S.C. § 111(a)
35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements
Priority and Benefit Claims
Provisional Application Benefit
35 U.S.C. § 112(a)
35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements
Priority and Benefit Claims
Provisional Application Benefit
35 U.S.C. § 119(e)
35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements
Priority and Benefit Claims
Provisional Application Benefit
35 U.S.C. § 120
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.1023
Claiming Benefit of Provisional37 CFR § 1.137
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.16
Petition to Suspend/Waive Rules (37 CFR 1.183)37 CFR § 1.183
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.53(b)
Claiming Benefit of Provisional37 CFR § 1.53(c)
Claiming Benefit of Provisional37 CFR § 1.53(g)
Claiming Benefit of Provisional37 CFR § 1.78(a)(2)
AIA Effective Dates37 CFR § 1.78(a)(6)
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.78(d)(1)(i)
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.78(d)(1)(ii)
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
37 CFR § 1.78(d)(1)(iii)
35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements
Priority and Benefit Claims
Provisional Application Benefit
MPEP § 201.06
AIA Effective DatesMPEP § 210
Provisional Application BenefitMPEP § 211.01(a)
Priority and Benefit ClaimsMPEP § 211.01(b)
35 U.S.C. 112 – Disclosure Requirements
Priority and Benefit Claims
Provisional Application Benefit
MPEP § 211.05
Filing, Search & Examination FeesForm Paragraph § 2.40
Designation of United States
International Design Application Fees
PCT Article 11

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31