MPEP § 2152.06 — Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection (Annotated Rules)
§2152.06 Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection
This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 2152.06, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection
This section addresses Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 100, 35 U.S.C. 102, and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). Contains: 2 permissions and 1 other statement.
Key Rules
35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art
In addition to persuasively arguing that the claims are patentably distinguishable over the prior art or amending the claims to overcome the prior art rejection, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) can be overcome by:
- (A) Submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78 by providing the required reference to a prior application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a), or filing a grantable petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim under 37 CFR 1.78. See MPEP § 211 et seq.; or
- (B) Submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78 by providing the required reference to a prior provisional application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or filing a grantable petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim under 37 CFR 1.78. See MPEP § 211 et seq.; or
- (C) Submitting a claim to priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) – (d) within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.55 by identifying a prior foreign application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior foreign application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or filing a grantable petition to accept a delayed priority claim under 37 CFR 1.55. See MPEP §§ 213 – 216. The foreign priority filing date must antedate the reference and be perfected. The filing date of the priority document is not perfected unless applicant has filed a certified priority document in the application (and an English language translation, if the document is not in English) (see 37 CFR 1.55(g)); or
- (D) Filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.130 to establish that an applied disclosure that was not made under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) more than one year before the effective filing date of the claimed invention is not prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) due to an exception listed in 35 U.S.C. 102(b). Under 37 CFR 1.130(a), an affidavit or declaration of attribution may be submitted to except a disclosure as prior art because it was made by the inventor or a joint inventor, or the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor. Under 37 CFR 1.130(b), an affidavit or declaration of prior public disclosure may be submitted to except an intervening disclosure as prior art if the subject matter disclosed had been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor (1) before the date the intervening disclosure was made on which the rejection is based, or (2) before the date the subject matter in the U.S. patent, U.S. patent application publication, or WIPO published application on which the rejection is based was effectively filed. See MPEP §§ 717 and 2155; or
- (E) Establishing common ownership or establishing evidence of a Joint Research Agreement to overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection or a 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection based on prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) by establishing entitlement to the 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception. See MPEP §§ 717.02 and 2154.02(c).
Note that all of the ways of overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) rejection mentioned in this subsection may also be used to overcome a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 that is based on 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) prior art.
Rejection on Prior Art
[Editor Note: This MPEP section is only applicable to applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in 35 U.S.C. 100 (note) and MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2139 et seq. for examination of applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102.]
Citations
| Primary topic | Citation |
|---|---|
| Rejection on Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 100 |
| Rejection on Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(2) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2)(C) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 103 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 35 U.S.C. § 120 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.130 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.130(a) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.130(b) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.55 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.55(g) |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.76 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | 37 CFR § 1.78 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | MPEP § 211 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | MPEP § 213 |
| Rejection on Prior Art | MPEP § 2139 |
| Rejection on Prior Art | MPEP § 2159 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | MPEP § 717 |
| 35 U.S.C. 102 – Novelty / Prior Art | MPEP § 717.02 |
Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP
This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.
Official MPEP § 2152.06 — Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection
Source: USPTO2152.06 Overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) Rejection [R-07.2022]
[Editor Note: This MPEP section is only applicable to applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in 35 U.S.C. 100 (note) and MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2139 et seq. for examination of applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102.]
In addition to persuasively arguing that the claims are patentably distinguishable over the prior art or amending the claims to overcome the prior art rejection, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) can be overcome by:
- (A) Submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78 by providing the required reference to a prior application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a), or filing a grantable petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim under 37 CFR 1.78. See MPEP § 211et seq.; or
- (B) Submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78 by providing the required reference to a prior provisional application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or filing a grantable petition to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim under 37 CFR 1.78. See MPEP § 211et seq.; or
- (C) Submitting a claim to priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) – (d) within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.55 by identifying a prior foreign application in a corrected application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76 and by establishing that the prior foreign application satisfies the enablement and written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or filing a grantable petition to accept a delayed priority claim under 37 CFR 1.55. See MPEP §§ 213 – 216. The foreign priority filing date must antedate the reference and be perfected. The filing date of the priority document is not perfected unless applicant has filed a certified priority document in the application (and an English language translation, if the document is not in English) (see 37 CFR 1.55(g)); or
- (D) Filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.130 to establish that an applied disclosure that was not made under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) more than one year before the effective filing date of the claimed invention is not prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) due to an exception listed in 35 U.S.C. 102(b). Under 37 CFR 1.130(a), an affidavit or declaration of attribution may be submitted to except a disclosure as prior art because it was made by the inventor or a joint inventor, or the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor. Under 37 CFR 1.130(b), an affidavit or declaration of prior public disclosure may be submitted to except an intervening disclosure as prior art if the subject matter disclosed had been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor (1) before the date the intervening disclosure was made on which the rejection is based, or (2) before the date the subject matter in the U.S. patent, U.S. patent application publication, or WIPO published application on which the rejection is based was effectively filed. See MPEP §§ 717 and 2155; or
- (E) Establishing common ownership or establishing evidence of a Joint Research Agreement to overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection or a 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection based on prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) by establishing entitlement to the 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception. See MPEP §§ 717.02 and 2154.02(c).
Note that all of the ways of overcoming a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) rejection mentioned in this subsection may also be used to overcome a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 that is based on 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) prior art.