MPEP § 1608 — Examination (Annotated Rules)

§1608 Examination

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 1608, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Examination

This section addresses Examination. Primary authority: 35 U.S.C. 101 and 35 U.S.C. 162. Contains: 3 statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Process (Method)

2 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1608-a30532900613b0ed3d97d584]
Plant Applications Follow Same Examination Process As National Applications
Note:
Plant applications must undergo the same examination process as other national patent applications, including requirements for statutory subject matter, utility, novelty, and claim specificity.

Plant applications are subject to the same examination process as any other national application. As such, the statutory provisions with regard to patentable subject matter, utility, novelty, obviousness, disclosure, and claim specificity requirements apply (35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112). The sole exception in terms of applicability of these statutory provisions is set forth in 35 U.S.C. 162.

Jump to MPEP SourceProcess (Method)Statutory Categories of InventionObviousness
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1608-f3bbd876ad48424c2fcece96]
Plant Applications Subject to Same Examination Process as Other National Applications Except for 35 U.S.C. 162
Note:
Plant applications are examined under the same statutory provisions as other national applications, except where specified in 35 U.S.C. 162.

Plant applications are subject to the same examination process as any other national application. As such, the statutory provisions with regard to patentable subject matter, utility, novelty, obviousness, disclosure, and claim specificity requirements apply (35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112). The sole exception in terms of applicability of these statutory provisions is set forth in 35 U.S.C. 162.

Jump to MPEP SourceProcess (Method)Statutory Categories of InventionObviousness
Topic

Obviousness

1 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1608-56dfc511cf8daa4df4da128e]
Same Examination Process for Plant Applications
Note:
Plant applications are subject to the same examination process as other national applications, including requirements for patentable subject matter, utility, novelty, obviousness, disclosure, and claim specificity.

Plant applications are subject to the same examination process as any other national application. As such, the statutory provisions with regard to patentable subject matter, utility, novelty, obviousness, disclosure, and claim specificity requirements apply (35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112). The sole exception in terms of applicability of these statutory provisions is set forth in 35 U.S.C. 162.

Jump to MPEP SourceObviousnessPatent EligibilityProcess (Method)

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Obviousness
Process (Method)
35 U.S.C. § 101
Obviousness
Process (Method)
35 U.S.C. § 162
MPEP § 1609

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31