37 CFR § 42.121 — Amendment of the patent. (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
37 CFR § 42.121 Amendment of the patent.
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 37 CFR § 42.121, including 0 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Official MPEP § 42.121 — Amendment of the patent.
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
42.121 Amendment of the patent.
- (a)
Motion to amend. A patent owner may file one
motion to amend a patent, but only after conferring with the
Board.
- (1) Due date. Unless a due date is provided in a Board order, a motion to amend must be filed no later than the filing of a patent owner response.
- (2)
Scope. A motion to amend may be denied
where:
- (i) The amendment does not respond to a ground of unpatentability involved in the trial; or
- (ii) The amendment seeks to enlarge the scope of the claims of the patent or introduce new subject matter.
- (3) A reasonable number of substitute claims. A motion to amend may cancel a challenged claim or propose a reasonable number of substitute claims. The presumption is that only one substitute claim would be needed to replace each challenged claim, and it may be rebutted by a demonstration of need.
- (b)
Content. A motion to amend claims must include a
claim listing, which claim listing may be contained in an appendix
to the motion, show the changes clearly, and set forth:
- (1) The support in the original disclosure of the patent for each claim that is added or amended; and
- (2) The support in an earlier-filed disclosure for each claim for which benefit of the filing date of the earlier filed disclosure is sought.
- (c) Additional motion to amend. In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, any additional motion to amend may not be filed without Board authorization. An additional motion to amend may be authorized when there is a good cause showing or a joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner to materially advance a settlement. In determining whether to authorize such an additional motion to amend, the Board will consider whether a petitioner has submitted supplemental information after the time period set for filing a motion to amend in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
- (d)
Burden of
Persuasion.
On a motion to amend:
- (1) A patent owner bears the burden of persuasion to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the motion to amend complies with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (3) of 35 U.S.C. 316(d) , as well as paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(1), and (b)(2) of this section;
- (2) A petitioner bears the burden of persuasion to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that any proposed substitute claims are unpatentable; and
- (3) Irrespective of paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, the Board may, in the interests of justice, exercise its discretion to grant or deny a motion to amend only for reasons supported by readily identifiable and persuasive evidence of record. In doing so, the Board may make of record only readily identifiable and persuasive evidence in a related proceeding before the Office or evidence that a district court can judicially notice. Where the Board exercises its discretion under this paragraph, the parties will have an opportunity to respond.
[Added, 77 FR 48680, Aug. 14, 2012, effective Sept. 16, 2012; para. (b) introductory text revised, 80 FR 28561, May 19, 2015, effective May 19, 2015; para. (d) added, 85 FR 82923, Dec. 21, 2020, effective Jan. 20, 2021, corrected to effective Jan. 21, 2021, 86 FR 2542, Jan. 13, 2021, correction withdrawn 86 FR 3815, Jan. 15, 2021]