What is the timeframe for notifying the USPTO of concurrent proceedings in reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The timeframe for notifying the USPTO of concurrent proceedings during reexamination is specified in 37 CFR 1.985 . According to MPEP 2282 : “37 CFR 1.985 requires a patent owner to notify the Office of any prior or concurrent proceedings in which the patent is or was involved.” While the specific timeframe is not mentioned in MPEP 2282, it’s important to note that this notification should be done promptly. The patent owner should inform the USPTO as soon as they become aware of any such proceedings to ensure that the reexamination takes into account all relevant information and to avoid potential issues with the reexamination certificate. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Notification of Prior or Concurrent Proceedings Required During Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2282 Patent Owner Must Notify Office of Prior Proceedings MPEP 2282 Required Patent Owner Must Notify Office of Prior or Concurrent Proceedings MPEP 2282 Required Updates to Patent File During Reexamination MPEP 2282 Requirement for Supplemental Examination Proceedings and Reviews MPEP 2282 Submission Must Be Bare Notice of Proceedings MPEP 2282 Requirement for Proper Reexamination Submissions MPEP 2282 Summaries of Litigation Arguments Not Entered MPEP 2282 Submission Must Follow Rules for Entry Rights MPEP 2282 Required Excessive Submissions May Be Discarded MPEP 2282 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What happens if a patent owner fails to notify the Office of prior or concurrent proceedings? What happens if a submission in an ex parte reexamination is not limited to bare notice of prior or concurrent proceedings? What is the patent owner&#8217;s responsibility regarding prio...