What are some examples that may not be sufficient to show an improvement in computer-functionality?

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The MPEP provides several examples that courts have indicated may not be sufficient to show an improvement in computer-functionality. According to MPEP 2106.05(a), these include:

• Generating restaurant menus with functionally claimed features
• Accelerating a process of analyzing audit log data when the increased speed comes solely from the capabilities of a general-purpose computer
• Mere automation of manual processes using generic computer components
• Recording, transmitting, and archiving digital images by use of conventional or generic technology
• Affixing a barcode to a mail object without specifying technical details of the barcode or how it’s generated
• Displaying two sets of information on a computer display without specifying how to achieve the desired result
• Providing historical usage information to users while inputting data
• Arranging transactional information on a graphical user interface

These examples typically involve using a computer as a tool to perform an existing process or implementing an abstract idea on a computer without improving its functionality.