How are claims selected for reexamination in inter partes proceedings?
In inter partes reexamination, claims are selected for reexamination based on whether they raise a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ). The MPEP provides examples of this process:
Claims 1 – 3 of the Key patent will be reexamined. … Accordingly, claim 4 will not be reexamined. … Finally, reexamination has not been requested for claims 5 – 20 of the Key patent. Accordingly, claims 5 – 20 will not be reexamined.
Key points on claim selection:
- Only claims for which an SNQ is found will be reexamined
- Claims not raising an SNQ are excluded from reexamination
- Claims not requested for reexamination are not included
- The examiner determines which claims meet the SNQ standard
This selective approach ensures that the reexamination focuses only on claims with potential patentability issues not previously addressed.
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2600 - Optional Inter Partes Reexamination,
MPEP 2647.01 - Examples Of Decisions On Requests,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure