What should not be included in a PCT application abstract?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 1826 , a PCT application abstract should not include: Statements on the alleged merits or value of the invention Speculative applications of the invention Superfluous language Legal phraseology such as “said” and “means” Prohibited items as defined in PCT Rule 9 The MPEP states: “ The abstract shall not contain statements on the alleged merits or value of the claimed invention or on its speculative application. ” This ensures that the abstract remains an objective summary of the technical disclosure. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Abstract Must Not Contain Merits or Speculative Applications MPEP 1826 Prohibited PCT Abstract Should Not Exceed A4 Sheet MPEP 1826 Recommended Abstract Must Accompany Patent Application MPEP 1826 Recommended Abstract Must Not Include Figures If Unhelpful MPEP 1826 Required Abstract Must Not Include Drawings MPEP 1826 Prohibited Abstract Must Adhere to PCT Rule 8 MPEP 1826 Required Abstract Must Focus on Invention’s Novelty MPEP 1826 Recommended Abstract Must Describe Invention Clearly MPEP 1826 Recommended Sequence Listing Must Not Be Included In Both Drawings and Description MPEP 608.02(d) Abstract Must Summarize Disclosure and Claims MPEP 1826 Required Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How should chemical formulae be included in a PCT application abstract? How should chemical formulas be presented in a PCT application abstract? What happens if an abstract is missing from a PCT application? What are the language requirements for the abstract in a PCT application? What are the restrictions on content in a PCT application abstract?