What is the legal basis for using interference testimony to antedate a reference?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The legal basis for using interference testimony to antedate a reference is rooted in patent law and practice, as documented in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). Specifically, MPEP 715.07(b) cites a legal precedent:

Ex parte Bowyer, 1939 C.D. 5, 42 USPQ 526 (Comm’r Pat. 1939).

This case established the practice of using interference testimony in lieu of a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit or declaration to antedate a reference. It’s important to note that this practice is primarily applicable to pre-AIA applications or when overcoming pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) rejections in AIA applications.

Tags: Ex Parte Bowyer, interference testimony, legal basis, patent law